It's generally believed that success in fields such as art and sport can only be achieved if a person has natural talent. However, it's sometimes claimed that any child can be taught to become a good sports person or artist.
Discuss both these views and give your opinion.
Throughout history, there have been many attempts to explain and determine whether any success in sports and art field is related to pure talent or it can alternatively be resulted from training and hard working. This disputable issue has been talked about for many centuries. In this essay, I will be trying to address both claims with possible explanations and examples and then consolidate my personal opinion.
It is well known that the greatest sports and art stars have been extremely gifted with unique talents, and this claim can be easily proved by looking at their early childhood. One of the examples is Lionel Messi, who is thought be the greatest football player over the history. Lionel, as a 10-year old child had exhibited distinguishable shows, that subsequently have persuaded a big club like FC Barcelona to sign him in their team and to be committed to afford all of his medical treatment. This example, and many other similar ones prove the notion that attributes the success in sports and art fields to congenital talents.
On the other hand, there is another aspect to be considered. There have been a few famous sports stars who have significantly develop their capabilities over their careers despite being relatively less talented, and in some occasions these athletics have managed to surpass those rivals even though being less talented than the latter. Moreover, art world has witnessed many talented people who have not seriously trained and eventually have curbed their developments and successes.
To conclude, I truly am of the opinion that talent is the most important factor in making sports and art stars, however in order to get a perfect player or artist, there has to be a combination of other cardinal elements such as hard work, training and winning mentality. I do not agree with the claim that if any child had been taught to play football, he would have been a good footballer.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-02-03 | Raspreet s. | 73 | view |
| 2022-01-09 | roopdeep | 56 | view |
| 2021-12-30 | Đại Phú | 56 | view |
| 2021-12-30 | Đại Phú | 56 | view |
| 2021-08-01 | nghiemngoc2912 | 84 | view |
- The chart shows the number of mobile phones and landlines per 100 people in selected countries Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information given 67
- Do the advantages of private means of transportation such as cars and motorbikes outweigh the disadvantages compared to public transport trains buses and taxis 73
- The bar chart shows type of media to get daily news by age group 2011 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- Research suggests that majority of criminals who are sent to prison commit crimes when set free What are the reasons What can be done to solve the problem 61
- The chart shows the percentage of women and men in one Asian country who passed when they took their driving test between 1980 and 2010 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 397, Rule ID: PERSONAL_OPINION_FRIENDSHIP[1]
Message: Use simply 'opinion'.
Suggestion: opinion
...ns and examples and then consolidate my personal opinion. It is well known that the greatest ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 127, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'developed'.
Suggestion: developed
...ous sports stars who have significantly develop their capabilities over their careers d...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, look, moreover, so, then, well, as to, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1609.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 322.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.99689440994 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23607819155 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67056368958 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 176.041082164 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.596273291925 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 490.5 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 69.1055452832 49.4020404114 140% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.083333333 106.682146367 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.8333333333 20.7667163134 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.91666666667 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.279070593949 0.244688304435 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0983268231316 0.084324248473 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0581607624274 0.0667982634062 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.173501530533 0.151304729494 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0425178576803 0.056905535591 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 50.2224549098 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.19 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.