Q3: Human activities have negative effects on plant and animal species. Some Human activities have negative effects on plant and animal species. Some people think it is too late to do anything about this problem. Others believe that effective measures can be taken to improve this situation. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Recently, the impact of human behaviour on animals as well as plants has become the subject of heated debate. Some people assert that if humans make an effort, they can prevent living creatures, including wildlife and plants, from disappearing, while others argue otherwise. Personally, I wholeheartedly agree with the former stance. In the following essay, both views will be discussed before a conclusion is reached with my opinion.
On the one hand, those who claim that people cannot make it possible for animals and plants not to become extinct do so for several reasons. Proponents of this argument insist that human beings have exploited a myriad of natural habitats without taking into account environmental degradation. As an illustration, although one notable natural heritage site designated by UNESCO in South Korea had a myriad of endangered species of birds, the majority of these species died out in 2010. In fact, it turned out that the main reason for this phenomenon was a huge amount of waste produced by travellers, which posed a threat to the local environment.
My opinion, however, is that mankind can protect animals and plants. Perhaps the most compelling reason is that not only do a multitude of governments across the globe invest vast sums of money in order to alleviate global warming exerting a detrimental influence on living creatures, but they also launch campaigns to warn of the dangers of wildlife's extinction, raising awareness amongst the public. Furthermore, everyday people can play a vital role in the preservation of animals and plants. If more individuals participate in recycling, a great deal of garbage accelerating the speed of the disappearance of animals and plants can be reduced, allowing them to live a longer life. In light of the above, I find these more persuasive.
In conclusion, it is undeniable that there are a variety of opinions about this topic. However, after considering this matter in a careful manner, I fully support the view that if every sector of our society makes a concerted effort, people can conserve both animals and plants for the reasons discussed above.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-27 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-27 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-27 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-21 | UL Finne | 89 | view |
| 2023-07-19 | ktoan | 89 | view |
- X 89
- QQQQQQQ1 Some people think that the best way to reduce time spent in traveling to work is to replace parks and gardens close to the city center with apartment buildings for commuters but others disagree Discuss both views and give your own opinion 89
- Q20 The family has a great influence on childen s development but the influence from outside the home plays a bigger part in children s life Do you agree or disagree 89
- Q7 Countries with a long average working time are more economically successful than those countries which do not have a long working time To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- Q16 Research says more and more business training and business meeting are taking place online Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 127, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a careful manner" with adverb for "careful"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... However, after considering this matter in a careful manner, I fully support the view that if every...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, so, well, while, in conclusion, in fact, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1797.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 348.0 315.596192385 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16379310345 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31911543099 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85858596867 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 176.041082164 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.620689655172 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 573.3 506.74238477 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 71.7016658725 49.4020404114 145% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.8 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.86666666667 7.06120827912 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.226690325999 0.244688304435 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0664036362308 0.084324248473 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0452061666794 0.0667982634062 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126708971343 0.151304729494 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0162027170812 0.056905535591 28% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.54 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 78.4519038076 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.