The government should spend more money on medical research to protect citizens’ health rather than on protecting the environment. Do you agree or disagree?
The ongoing debate over whether the governments should invest money in doing medical research with a view to improving citizen’s health or in environmental protection still remains a source of controversy. From my perspective, even though I would contend that people’s health is of foremost importance, I believe that the environment is also under dire threats that needs timely actions. This essay will discuss detailed reasons for both views before drawing a rational conclusion.
To embark on, there are several key rationales to why people’s health should be given priority. If people live a healthy life without coming down with any diseases, the governments can invest money in different major areas such as economics, military and even education. That is to say, a nation fraught with appalling diseases or contagious plagues will have to expend their budget in curing illnesses, thus resulting in a dearth of funds and workforce to increase the economic growth since they are all on the verge of death. Therefore, only when people’s heath is ensured can the country flourish. Moreover, health is a potential field that can act as a powerful tool to assist the revenue of one country. It is crystal clear to see that if one country possesses pragmatic medical research, they can sell it to other countries and earn a fortune, which may go up to billion dollars.
Despite abovementioned benefits of medical care, it is worth noting that environmental problems can act as a deterrent to all the progresses if they reach an alarming rate. To be more specific, extreme heat which stems from climate change is the main culprit for more than 70000 deaths in Europe just in the year 2003. Its manifold forms also afflict around 300 million people, thus rising fear among everybody in the world if it exacerbates. In simple words, efforts of developing healthcare systems will go down the drain if it is not solved simultaneously with environmental problems. What is more, this pressing problem also afflicts vegetation and animals through global warming, ice melting and deplorable natural disasters. Consequently, people have no food supplying sources to rely on, thereby vanishing sooner or later.
To conclude, medical care and environmental protection are of paramount importance that should be handled all at once to make sure that one will not hinder the process of the other for long-term benefits.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-22 | hieu13092006 | 89 | view |
| 2023-05-26 | thanhtu000 | 80 | view |
| 2022-01-22 | phanhhh | 78 | view |
| 2021-11-24 | Henry14 | 78 | view |
| 2021-09-18 | immtee | 84 | view |
- Some are of the opinion that people are naturally born as good leaders while others feel that leadership skills can be learned Discuss both views and give your own opinion 95
- Fossil fuels such as coal oil and natural gas are the main source for many countries However some nations are using alternative energy such as solar power and wind power Do you think this is a positive or negative development 84
- Nowadays many people choose to be self employed rather than to work for a company or organisation Why might this be the case What could be the disadvantages of being self employed 73
- People are having more and more sugar based drinks What are the reasons What can be done to make people drink less 95
- Modern technology has made it easier for individuals to download copyrighted music and books from the internet for no charge To what extent is this a positive or a negative development 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 869, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a billion'.
Suggestion: a billion
... and earn a fortune, which may go up to billion dollars. Despite abovementioned benef...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, if, may, moreover, so, still, therefore, thus, such as, what is more, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 41.998997996 131% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2031.0 1615.20841683 126% => OK
No of words: 392.0 315.596192385 124% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18112244898 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44960558625 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83478749607 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 248.0 176.041082164 141% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.632653061224 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 617.4 506.74238477 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.3899766868 49.4020404114 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.9375 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5 20.7667163134 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 7.06120827912 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.188621486583 0.244688304435 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.050827307761 0.084324248473 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.076757122612 0.0667982634062 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115368445356 0.151304729494 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0667935631978 0.056905535591 117% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.06 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.46 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 78.4519038076 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.