Many people believe that scientific research should be carried out and controlled by government rather than private companies. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Scientific research is a “catch-all” term to illustrate the analysis of science in every domain of our life from behavioral mechanisms to the formation of subjects. As a result, this leads to the questioning against the ownership of these experiments between the national authority and the financially independent labels. Personally, from the viewpoint of a bystander, I perceive that neither of them outweighs the other.
In terms of the science-based studies, they leave an annual financial burden on the involved partners’ budget which in the long run, is a contribution to the depletion of the governmental revenue. Every year, the regularly updated statistics have supported the idea of huge investment in this field that mere cost for the maintenance of labs’ facilities has burned billions of dollars from the investors. Moreover, when it comes to the national pocket, most of it is from the mandatary tax policy from the domestic revenue which will see the occurrence of protests on the rising of tax for such experiments. Therefore, in regard to the financial maintenance in this field, this will leave the companies an upper hand to handle.
However, on the other side of the coin, this puts a concern on the surveillance of these scientific experiments. Without national supervision, the conduction of these experiments lays a worry in their consequences which are hidden from society. In the mid of 19th century, without the control of the authority, many unethically psychological experiments such as Stanford prison experiments had been conducted which had resulted in far-reaching continuous consequences to the involved participants and the society as a whole till here and now.
In conclusion, as it has shown that each of these owners has their own strong suit, I am still quite skeptical to come to the very last decision between them.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-21 | hieu13092006 | 89 | view |
| 2022-07-21 | nhattram39 | 78 | view |
| 2022-07-21 | nhattram39 | 78 | view |
| 2021-08-18 | oanhnth | 11 | view |
| 2021-08-18 | oanhnth | 11 | view |
- Discuss the pros and cons for children of watching television 73
- What are the pros and cons for children of watching television 89
- Although many people value their public parks this space could be better used for other purposes such as residential areas for the ever growing population or to develop business and boost economies To what extent do you agree or disagree with this 78
- Financial burden has always been a concern to each of us hence many prioritize their economic earnings more than anything which includes the real inner value in their working life To an extent monthly gains are essential but they are not everything 73
- More and more people are choosing to eat healthy food and making time to exercise regularly Why and what can we do to encourage this 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Scientific research is a “catch-all” ter...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, moreover, so, still, therefore, in conclusion, such as, as a result, in regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 41.998997996 131% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1569.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 299.0 315.596192385 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.2474916388 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14925878529 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.565217391304 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 479.7 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 54.1789199957 49.4020404114 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.636363636 106.682146367 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.1818181818 20.7667163134 131% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 7.06120827912 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0384336804375 0.244688304435 16% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0143861663264 0.084324248473 17% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0200546046967 0.0667982634062 30% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0215979117453 0.151304729494 14% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0167837161052 0.056905535591 29% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 13.0946893788 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 50.2224549098 88% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.47 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.62 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.