In recent years, the family structure has changed, as well as family roles.
What types of changes are occurring?
Do you think these changes are positive or negative?
The family has been the basic unit of social structure since ancient times. However, in the past few decades, the patterns of a family have experienced a dramatic change concerning the organization and roles of members. I am strongly convinced that these adjustments could bring about more advantages than disadvantages.
To begin with, the structure of a family is relatively different compared to that in the past. These days, many households have a tendency to reduce their family size to just only two generations shared the same house. This is in sharp contrast to the earlier periods when a majority of families are extended households with three generations or more including parents, their offspring, and other near relatives.
Furthermore, in recent years, the shift in roles of both spouses could be seen more often. Traditionally, while men are deemed to be the breadwinner, the dominating social role of women is as housewives, fully focus on the household chores and taking care of the family. However, in the modern world, both men and women could join the workforce to provide for the whole family, whereas household tasks are often equally divided.
Such changes, however, could be advantageous to modern society. Firstly, having fewer members in a family, the privacy, freedom, and convenience of each individual could be preserved. In a household, individuals could have a myriad of pastimes. So as not to disrupt other members, providing each individual with their own space is crucial. More importantly, employed women can help ease the financial burden and raise their household income. With the emergence of a supplementary source of earnings, the living standard of that family, therefore, would be raised.
To conclude, there are many significant changes in how a family is organized and the roles each member plays. However, I believe that alteration is justified and many families, as well as human society in general, could reap various benefits associated.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-05-18 | thanhtu000 | 73 | view |
| 2022-07-19 | qaengx12 | 89 | view |
| 2021-08-19 | ndt2709 | 78 | view |
| 2021-02-21 | RosieMattea | 78 | view |
- To what extent does the Internet increase social cohesion 78
- We are becoming increasingly dependent on computer based technology How do you think it will change in the future Is it good for us to rely so much on computers 61
- In some countries many people are choosing to live alone nowadays than in the past Do you think it is a positive or negative development 89
- Because some children don t have the natural ability to learn language school should not force them to learn foreign language Agree or disagree 73
- We are becoming increasingly dependent on computer based technology How do you think it will change in the future Is it good for us to rely so much on computers 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 429, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...sehold tasks are often equally divided. Such changes, however, could be advantag...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, so, therefore, well, whereas, while, in general, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1673.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 318.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26100628931 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22286093782 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88688322845 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.588050314465 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 533.7 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.7153079904 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.4117647059 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7058823529 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.82352941176 7.06120827912 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.4128256513 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.157111369797 0.244688304435 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.052634190834 0.084324248473 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.067080227769 0.0667982634062 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101462864494 0.151304729494 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0743386564811 0.056905535591 131% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.59 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 78.4519038076 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.