The line graph below shows the production of paper, wood pulp and sawn-wood in the UK from 1980 to 2000. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The graph illustrates how many million tonnes were the forest industry produced, namely paper and packaging, sawn-wood, wood pulp in the UK over a period of 20 years.
In general, what stood out from the graph was that the amount of production of sawn-wood exceeded the figure for wood pulp for the first time in 1990. Meanwhile, as can be seen from the graph the most dramatic increase was in the amount of production of wood pulp during the last 10 years of the graph.
In 1980, the respective amount of paper and packaging, sawn-wood, and wood pulp stood at 230, 200, 160 million tonnes. Over the following 10 years, the amount of paper and packaging industry rose slightly to 250 million tonnes. There was a sharp decrease of 50 million tonnes in the amount of sawn-wood industry produced. A similar pattern could be seen for wood pulp, with the figure dropping to only 10 million tonnes.
By 2000, the amount of produced paper and packaging industry had experienced a dramatic surge to 350 million tonnes. Meanwhile, the year 2000 also witnessed a gentle increase to about 5 million tonnes in the amount of wood pulp industry produced. By contrast, the figure for sawn-wood industry continued to fall to under 150 million tonnes.
- Some people think an aging population can cause big problems Others however think the aging population has many advantages for business government and for society in general 73
- The pictures below show the process of making clothes from recycled plastic bottles Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The graph below shows UK acid rain emissions measured in millions of tonnes from four different sectors between 1990 and 2007 73
- In the past people wore their traditional clothes and followed their culture These days most people wear similar clothes and therefore look very similar to one another Do you think this is a positive or a negative development 67
- Should we allow GM Food Give reasons to support your opinion 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, so, while, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1033.0 965.302439024 107% => OK
No of words: 213.0 196.424390244 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.84976525822 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82027741392 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49888775981 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.469483568075 0.547539520022 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 291.6 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 24.7297391818 43.030603864 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 103.3 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.4 5.23603664747 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.265613400829 0.215688989381 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.133510435314 0.103423049105 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0704636060814 0.0843802449381 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.194892379357 0.15604864568 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0462310016672 0.0819641961636 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.85 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.9 8.06136585366 86% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.