The plans show changes to the layout of a theatre between 2010 and 2012
The diagram compares how the plan of a theatre had changed from 2010 to 2012.
Overall, the theatre had increased in size and some accommodations had been added in the given period.
In 2010, there was a storage in the right, while the dressing room was placed at the end of the theatre. From the main door, admin office and ticket office could be seen from the left, whereas to the right, there was a café. Furthermore, the Auditorium was built in the middle of the plan, across the stage.
By 2012, the structure has changed. Dressing room was minimized to the right corner, meanwhile, next to it, showers was added and storage was moved to the left. Following that, admin office was replaced to the left corner and ticket office was then relocated besides the restaurant constructed behind the main door. Since the theatre size had been widen, a coordination was also resided right at the end of the stage.
- It is now possible for scientists and tourists to travel to remote natural environment such as the South Pole Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages 78
- The number of older people is increasing What are the advantages and disadvantages of this 61
- The number of older people is increasing What are the advantages and disadvantages of this 56
- The development of tourism contributed to English becoming the most prominent language in the world Some people think this will lead to English becoming the only language to be spoken globally What are the advantages and disadvantages to having one langua 61
- The line chart shows the percentage of people living in Australia born in Asia UK and other regions 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 349, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'widened'.
Suggestion: widened
...n door. Since the theatre size had been widen, a coordination was also resided right ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, furthermore, so, then, whereas, while, as to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 761.0 965.302439024 79% => OK
No of words: 161.0 196.424390244 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.72670807453 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56210296601 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.39448848265 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 86.0 106.607317073 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.534161490683 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 222.3 283.868780488 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.606765958 43.030603864 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.5555555556 112.824112599 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8888888889 22.9334400587 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.55555555556 5.23603664747 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.129300992767 0.215688989381 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0807974536913 0.103423049105 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.115857842692 0.0843802449381 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133874447031 0.15604864568 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.149201561109 0.0819641961636 182% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 13.2329268293 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 61.2550243902 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.86 11.4140731707 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.52 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.