Of the two leading brands of automobiles launched in past year Kia cars are clearly more superior to the competing Alfa cars Kia cars boast aesthetically pleasing design and a fuel economy of 30kms per litre in the past quarter alone 5000 Kia cars were so

Essay topics:

Of the two leading brands of automobiles launched in past year, Kia cars are clearly more superior to the competing Alfa cars. Kia cars boast aesthetically pleasing design and a fuel economy of 30kms per litre. in the past quarter alone, 5000 Kia cars were sold. Alfa cars, on the other hand have received only a few positive reviews regarding their overall performances. I have personally test driven both brand cars and I strongly recommend that you buy a Kia car for superior performance at an affordable price

In the note from the sedan owner, he or she gives a strong recommendation to a friend to buy a Kia car as compared to an Alfa car based on supposedly better performance and cost-effectiveness. But many assumptions have been made before giving this suggestion. These would have to be have to be addressed in greater detail to go forward with the recommendation, without which it proves to be unwarranted.

Firstly, only two factors have been considered to gauge the superiority of the Kia car, namely its aesthetic design and fuel efficiency. But to holistically judge a car many more unstated characteristics like the cost of the car, maintenance overhead, top speed, comfort, corresponding accessories etc. have to be taken into consideration. It might be possible that the Alfa car supersedes its Kia counterpart significantly in these other playing fields, hence making it a much better car choice.

Secondly, it is mentioned that the economy of the Kia car is around 50 kilometers per litre, but there has been no mention of the fuel economy of the Alfa car. It is possible that both cars might have near similar mileage. Furthermore, it is also stated that there have been only few affirmative reviews of the Alfa car on its overall performance. But there has been no mention on what are the parameters on which this performance had been assessed. More evidence of the specifics of both the cars is needed without which the explanation provided weakens the given recommendation.

Furthermore, there is a mention of the quarterly sales of the Kia car, which is 8000 units. But there is not mention of the same statistic of the Alfa. It might be probable that the Alfa car due to its lower cost and other superior traits might have recorded far better sales figures in the same quarter than the Kia. If this were true, it shows that the general positive consumer sentiment is leaning towards the Alfa brand car. Also, there hasn't been any detailed and objective, study done for comparison between both the cars. The suggestion made in the note is a personal one and can be subjected to an inherent bias of the recommender.

Therefore, with the above reasons examined, we can conclude that the given recommendation has many glaring unwarranted assumptions. Without further details and evidences provided to elucidate these assumptions, the given recommendation does not hold water.

Votes
Average: 8.2 (3 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-08-30 CHAITRALI PHATAK 50 view
2023-08-24 Kshitij Kasabekar 60 view
2023-08-16 yuktapradeep 50 view
2021-08-23 rohitraju3010 82 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user rohitraju3010 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 443, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: hasn't
...towards the Alfa brand car. Also, there hasnt been any detailed and objective, study ...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, hence, if, second, secondly, so, therefore

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 19.6327345309 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.9520958084 54% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 11.1786427146 107% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 13.6137724551 81% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 28.8173652695 97% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 55.5748502994 86% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 16.3942115768 116% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1996.0 2260.96107784 88% => OK
No of words: 400.0 441.139720559 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.99 5.12650576532 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.472135955 4.56307096286 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03438626414 2.78398813304 109% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 204.123752495 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.515 0.468620217663 110% => OK
syllable_count: 639.0 705.55239521 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 4.96107784431 181% => OK
Article: 2.0 8.76447105788 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.70958083832 37% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.67365269461 299% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.22255489022 95% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 19.7664670659 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.8473053892 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.9311908162 57.8364921388 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.8 119.503703932 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 23.324526521 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.1 5.70786347227 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.25449101796 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.20758483034 61% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 6.88822355289 102% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.67664670659 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.32467443979 0.218282227539 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103541913149 0.0743258471296 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.102038144575 0.0701772020484 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.183645626753 0.128457276422 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.112574242277 0.0628817314937 179% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 14.3799401198 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 48.3550499002 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.197005988 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 12.5979740519 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.42 8.32208582834 101% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 98.500998004 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 12.3882235529 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.1389221557 90% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.9071856287 101% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 4.0 out of 6
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 4 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 8 2
No. of Sentences: 19 15
No. of Words: 401 350
No. of Characters: 1941 1500
No. of Different Words: 202 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.475 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.84 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.931 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 117 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 99 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 69 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 49 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 21.105 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 6.851 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.632 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.348 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.56 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.118 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5