The given bar chart demonstrates the proportion of people who speak Irish according to four provinces in the Republic of Ireland by the survey period from 1981 to 2002.
In general, it is obvious that there was a similar pattern in each province, which rose slightly until 1991, dramatically increasing in 1996 and a smaller growth again in 2002. Besides, it is also noted that Leinster was the only area to register a fall between 1981 and 1986.
In 1981, Connacht had the highest ratio of individuals speaking Irish with roughly 35% to 40%, whereas the second position was about 5% lower with 35%. Additionally, the figures for State and Ulster shared the same situation with 30%, closely followed by that of Leinster, which had the most diminutive Irish speakers in the chart with merely 27%.
In the next 17 years, all five countries in the chart witnessed a slight increase before suddenly experiencing a surge from 1991 to 1996. In 2002, the proportion of people who can speak Irish in Connacht still remained the highest position in the list with 47%, only 1% higher than that of Munster, increasing by 10% to 46%. Simultaneously, over 40% was recorded for both the figures of State and Ulster, ranked third. In addition, although the Irish speakers in Leinster experienced a considerable rise from 27% to 37%, still bottomed the chart.
- The monthly price of exported rice from Thailand and Vietnam from 2012 to 2015 Million dollars per tons 84
- The diagram below shows the water cycle which is the continuous movement of water on above and below the surface of the Earth 95
- The charts below show the results of a survey of the primary exercise objectives and locations of a selected group of adults between 20 and 50 years of age Summarise the information by selection and reporting the main features and make comparisons where r 86
- the maps below show an art gallery in Australia in 1950 and now 78
- the table shows the average weekly salaries of men and women working in different occupations 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, second, so, still, third, whereas, in addition, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1126.0 965.302439024 117% => OK
No of words: 229.0 196.424390244 117% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91703056769 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89008302616 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63354621819 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 106.607317073 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.598253275109 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 314.1 283.868780488 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.695500829 43.030603864 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.111111111 112.824112599 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.4444444444 22.9334400587 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.11111111111 5.23603664747 155% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.149606328167 0.215688989381 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0585206764078 0.103423049105 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.053365614232 0.0843802449381 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.084163146115 0.15604864568 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0531430914853 0.0819641961636 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.01 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 40.7170731707 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.