Some people believe that unpaid community service should be a compulsory part of high school programmes. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Whether voluntary work should be a compulsory part of high schools’ curriculum remains a controversial question. While a number of people highly praised the merits of unpaid community service, others claim that obliged voluntary work can have some downsides. From my point of view, the latter holds true for a variety of reasons.
First and foremost, balancing time between academic schoolwork and voluntary activities is a strenuous part to most students. It is an irrefutable fact when doing volunteer work, a student must dedicate a great deal of his time to charities and voluntary organisations, helping deprived people in the community and protecting the environment. This will bring invaluable experience and knowledge to those who can manipulate their time. However, for students who lack time management skills, along with innumerable school assignments, compulsory unpaid community service can place a huge burden on them, depriving their energy and contributing to exhaustion and tiredness. As a consequence, those students are likely to develop health problems and worsen their academic performance.
Secondly, some students may take advantage of community services to neglect other activities once it is made a compulsory part in high schools’ programmes. For example, a teenager can use voluntary work as an excuse for his ignorance of schoolwork and household chores. More seriously, some students may lie to their parents that they are participating in community services, but in fact, they are being heavily absorbed in online games or hanging around with bad people. This can increase their chances of getting lured to social evils such as crime or drug abuse and ruin their future door.
Last but not least, there are numerous impoverished students who struggle everyday life with part-time jobs to pay their schools’ tuition fees. If unpaid voluntary work is an obliged part of the schools’ programme, those students will miss out on part-time job opportunities and therefore not have sufficient money to pay for high school education. As a result, they will either be discouraged from pursuing further knowledge or run the chances of dropping out of school.
In conclusion, unpaid community service can possess some negative sides. It can not only be a contributory factor to declining health, worsening academic performances but also spoil students’ opportunities both to continue education and get a brighter future.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-09-01 | Hai Anh Phan Thi | 84 | view |
| 2021-09-01 | Hai Anh Phan Thi | 84 | view |
- Wearing uniforms 78
- The chart below shows the amount of leisure time enjoyed by men and women of different employment status 89
- Students should be taught academic knowledge so that they can pass exams and skills such as cooking or dressing should not be taught To what extent do you agree disagree 73
- With the pressure on today s young people to succeed academically some people believe that non academic subjects at school e g physical education and cookery should be removed from the syllabus so that children can concentrate wholly on academic subjects 61
- It is said that people who read books for pleasure have better imagination and language skills than people who watch TV Do you agree or disagree 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whether” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
Whether voluntary work should be a compulsory p...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, for example, in conclusion, in fact, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2076.0 1615.20841683 129% => OK
No of words: 380.0 315.596192385 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.46315789474 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41515443553 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98746689501 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 220.0 176.041082164 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.578947368421 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 647.1 506.74238477 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.8814681027 49.4020404114 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.117647059 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3529411765 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.82352941176 7.06120827912 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.9879759519 251% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.242889157366 0.244688304435 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0836161135865 0.084324248473 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0807180638547 0.0667982634062 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148101264886 0.151304729494 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0446463814493 0.056905535591 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.68 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.38 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 78.4519038076 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.