It is a natural process for animal species to become extinct (e.g. dinosaur, dodo…) There is no reason why people should try to prevent this from happening. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In many countries, there are a great deal of campaigns or schemes founded in order to protect endangered species. However, a certain number of people believe that extinction is a naturally occurring phenomenon that has occurred on Earth since life began, thus there is no compelling reason for us to do so. This essay argues that it is highly critical to deter animals from becoming extinct and will explain further reasons.
It is undeniable that centuries ago, many ancient species, such as dinosaurs, were wiped out due to a gradual shift of climate or rising sea level. This is not the primary cause resulting in the disappearance of animals nowadays though. Human activities like agriculture, industrialization and poaching should be the main factors which push creatures to this dreadful situation. In light of the fact that the world population is increasing exponentially, we have to sacrifice natural habitats for farming as well as constructing infrastructures and houses. Moreover, there are poachers who sell animal’s body parts in the black market. Elephant tusks, rhino horns or leopard skins are the most exorbitant. Although everyone has a special affection for wildlife, not anyone knows how to preserve it.
Other justifications for saving wild animals involve the significant roles that they play in not only the balance of the ecosystem but also our lives. Everything in nature is connected, if one species happens to become extinct, others could be affected detrimentally as the food chain is disrupted. Wild animals also have great aesthetic and sociocultural values. They contribute to our rich biodiversity that makes this planet a beautiful place. In numerous places around the world, many types of animals play an essential role in various cultures.To illustrate, in some religions, cows are revered and worshiped as gods.
In conclusion, there is a distinction between extinction caused by environmental and human-related factors. It is our duty to preserve and protect animals as their presence has a crucial influence on us in many aspects.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2022-08-27 | Lê Khánh Diệp | 84 | view |
2022-01-12 | lennie.butera | 89 | view |
2022-01-06 | lennie.butera | 89 | view |
2022-01-06 | lennie.butera | 89 | view |
2021-10-09 | Kien Vu | 84 | view |
- It is a natural process for animal species to become extinct e g dinosaur dodo There is no reason why people should try to prevent this from happening To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- The graph shows the number of visitors to four international museums between 1980 and 2015 84
- Parents should not pressure their children to choose a particular profession Young people should have the freedom to choose a career path they like To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- The table shows information about department stores and online stores in Australia in 2011 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 38, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'deals'?
Suggestion: deals
In many countries, there are a great deal of campaigns or schemes founded in orde...
^^^^
Line 5, column 550, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: To
...y an essential role in various cultures.To illustrate, in some religions, cows are...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, moreover, so, thus, well, in conclusion, in fact, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1754.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 329.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.33130699088 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25891501996 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05151733101 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 217.0 176.041082164 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.659574468085 0.561755894193 117% => OK
syllable_count: 551.7 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.459703443 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.176470588 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3529411765 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.47058823529 7.06120827912 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.216085311548 0.244688304435 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0547041426629 0.084324248473 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0513389731036 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115970921286 0.151304729494 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0585438751271 0.056905535591 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.05 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 114.0 78.4519038076 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.