Studying with a group of students in a classroom is more beneficial than learning online at home To what extent do you agree or disagree

Essay topics:

Studying with a group of students in a classroom is more beneficial than learning online at home.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?

In terms of technology's innovations, the form of which the classroom is organized has changed. Since virtual classes' appearance, debates have come up whether online or offline education is more efficient and convenient. This writer’s perspectives strongly believe in offline class’s benefits due to the fact of the 3 key factors: more physical interaction, distract students from toxic temptation and keep the educational system in a stable condition.

Visual classrooms enhance opportunities for profound connections, physical interactions among teachers and friends. As a precedent, offline classes have been implemented for the long-lasting time and consequently.Due to their long-lasting time, they demonstrate their efficient and pivotal role in education by not only connecting school counterparts on the contrary also diverging forms of absorb knowledge. It is explained that the more interactions and bonding they experience, the more sympathetic and thoughtful they would be when facing an issue such as homework or even arguments. Therefore, offline classes illustrated their potential
Discussing the other reason, offline classes might separate students from toxic temptations. Toxic temptations here prefer to the addiction of online games and social media during classes. Under supervised circumstances, students are not capable of losing disciplines and they also force themself to behave as well-mannered as possible. Offline classes are regarded as the foundation that prevents students who do not manipulate themselves well from distractions. Simultaneously, the learning environment probably ensures its quality.

Finally, visual classrooms support constructing a constant school’s organization system. Schools are places which consist of multiple characteristics so it is understandable whenever problems come up. In the context of virtual classes, there will be various obstacles interfering us to maintain the issue. In contrast, if it were offline classes, there would be more efficient methods such as profound conversations. For instance, misunderstanding among friends might not be cooled down through virtual talks and even become significantly serious. Thus, offline classes should be considered as the form of study which brings efforts from learning to school relationships.

In conclusion, although there are skeptics about offline classes' advantages, it seems like this is the most appropriate study method for students in recent years due to 3 key factors: more physical interaction, distract students from toxic temptation and keep the educational system in a stable condition.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-12-30 Daniel3003 67 view
2023-09-08 hinhin411 56 view
2023-08-16 hunghoang 61 view
2023-07-07 quoctoan@ 78 view
2023-07-07 quoctoan@ 78 view
Essays by user John Ipin :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...cational system in a stable condition. Visual classrooms enhance opportunities ...
^^^
Line 3, column 214, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Due
... the long-lasting time and consequently.Due to their long-lasting time, they demons...
^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ironment probably ensures its quality. Finally, visual classrooms support const...
^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...from learning to school relationships. In conclusion, although there are skepti...
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, finally, if, so, therefore, thus, well, for instance, in conclusion, in contrast, such as, on the contrary

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2254.0 1615.20841683 140% => OK
No of words: 376.0 315.596192385 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.99468085106 5.12529762239 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40348946061 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.29536194775 2.80592935109 117% => OK
Unique words: 217.0 176.041082164 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.577127659574 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 669.6 506.74238477 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.2455239466 49.4020404114 132% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.222222222 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8888888889 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.06120827912 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.114850135568 0.244688304435 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0383641043404 0.084324248473 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0251536913215 0.0667982634062 38% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0709740538167 0.151304729494 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0223984699071 0.056905535591 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.46 12.4159519038 141% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.05 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 129.0 78.4519038076 164% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.