The younger generation is mainly responsible for latest technological developments. How far do you agree?
These days, the role of young people in progress of contemporary technology is increasing sharply. Some politicians claim that growing population are required to take responsibility for this progress, while some teachers are opposed to them and argue this obligation lies with others. In this essay, I will discuss both opinions and agree with teachers.
Let us start by looking at the reasons why some politicians argue that youngsters ought to lead the most recent technological evolution. The first reason is that they are more creative in developing technology. They tend to come up with original ideas easily, so that they can make a great contribution to cutting-edge advances. Another reason is that they have more spare time to spend on development. In contrast to adults, young people can allocate a considerable amount of time to this development, because they both have no families to take care and job to do. After the consideration of the reasons, it is clear that growing generation should take the lead in this improvement.
On the other hand, some teachers believe that the youth should be responsible for state-of-the-art advancement. They justify their point of view with the following arguments. First of all, they are expected to have proper childhood. If children played a major role in developing technology, then they would suffer from lack of social skills, since they would not have normal childhood to develop necessary skills for life in society. Secondly, they are not thoroughly experienced. Young people can make a crucial mistake in this progress and, therefore, ruin projects, as they are inexperienced as well as cannot take account of important features. After the analysis of these argumentations, it is obvious that young people must not participate in technological development.
In conclusion, even though some politicians make a statement that latest technological progress predominantly lies with young people, personally, I believe that they should not meddle with it.
- Most large companies nowadays operate multi-nationally. To what extent do multinational companies have responsibilities toward local communities in which they operate? 84
- In some cities and towns all over the world, the high volume of traffic is a problem.What are the causes of this and what actions can be taken to solve this problem? 78
- The television is good for you.Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of watching television.Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience. 11
- Walking is known to be beneficial for health and yet fewer people are walking there days.What are the reasons for this?What can be done to tackle this problem? 67
- You have just moved into a new home and are planning to hold a party. You are worried that the noise may disturb your neighbour.Write a letter to your neighbour. In your letterintroduce yourselfdescribe your plans for the partyinvite your neighbour to com 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 212, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...onsibility for this progress, while some teachers are opposed to them and argue t...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, look, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, well, while, in conclusion, in contrast, as well as, first of all, in contrast to, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 24.0651302605 158% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1701.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 318.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.34905660377 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22286093782 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08586717845 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.562893081761 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 524.7 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 9.0 2.10420841683 428% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.8561903513 49.4020404114 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.058823529 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7058823529 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.47058823529 7.06120827912 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.110918095806 0.244688304435 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0347669539016 0.084324248473 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0287320855858 0.0667982634062 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0704680037392 0.151304729494 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0129237866303 0.056905535591 23% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.75 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.