“Manufacturers are responsible for ensuring that their products are safe. If a product injures someone, for whatever reason, the manufacturer should be held legally and financially accountable for the injury.”
Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the opinion stated above. Support your views with reasons and/or examples from your own experience, observations, or reading.
The statement stating that the Manufacturers are responsible for ensuring that their products are safe and if a product injures someone, for whatever reason, the manufacturer should be held legally and financially accountable for the injury can be agreed upon. Industrialists and its manufacturers produce goods and products that the public use for various purposes. They have a responsibility of producing products that are safe and can be used by anybody. However, the manufacturers should design the products in such a way that these products do not pose or influence any injury that could be harmful.
There have been many products worldwide that had serious manufacturing flaws leading to injuries and critical problems. One such example is the smartphone producer billion-dollar company Samsung, whose S8 smartphone device had a manufacturing defect in its lithium-ion battery. The smartphone had various complaints from its users worldwide stating that the smartphone constantly gets heated and, in some cases there were even reportings of the smartphone exploding. In response to these complaints, the company reinspected the design and manufacturing of the S8 device and then released a more stable new version of the Samsung S8 in the market. Thus, we should ensure that in such cases the products that we use are completely safe and at the same time the manufacturers have to also take the responsibility of being held accountable like the billion-dollar company Samsung if there are some major flaws in the product's design.
A faulty device or any product is not just the only thing that people should be wary about but, using anything cautiously and ethically is very important. Many times people tend to overlook the deleterious effects of some products that they might have and end up harming themselves. In such situations, the manufacturers cannot be held accountable because of our carelessness. We should understand the extent of using these products before getting too friendly.
In conclusion, if a product is having a manufacturing flaw that poses a serious threat to the surroundings, then the manufacturer has to be held accountable for these situations financially as well as legally. Also, as a consumer, it is our responsibility to understand the extent of using such products so that they do not cause any serious harm and are completely healthy.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-10-03 | sanket_chaudhary | 50 | view |
- The following appeared as part of a petition sent to residents of Youngtown by an environmental protection group The Smith Corporation should not be permitted to develop the land that is now part of the Youngtown Wildlife Preserve This sanctuary is essent 48
- Techcorporation is our top pick for investment this term We urge all of our clients to invest in this new company For the first time in ten years a company that has developed satellite technology has been approved by the FTA to compete with the current sa 66
- Do you agree disagree with the following statement The increase in automation will lead to people losing their jobs 88
- Directions Give yourself 3 minutes to read the passage Reading Time 3 minutes Critics say that current voting systems used in the United States are inefficient and often lead to the inaccurate counting of votes Miscounts can be especially damaging if an e 78
- An ailing patient should have easy access to his or her doctor s record of treating similarly afflicted patients Through gaining such access the ailing patient may better determine whether the doctor is competent to treat that medical condition Write a re 50
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, look, so, then, thus, well, as to, in conclusion, as well as, in some cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.5258426966 108% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.3162921348 133% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 33.0505617978 97% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 58.6224719101 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 2.0 12.9106741573 15% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2005.0 2235.4752809 90% => OK
No of words: 379.0 442.535393258 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.29023746702 5.05705443957 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41224685777 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15252532296 2.79657885939 113% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 215.323595506 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.469656992084 0.4932671777 95% => OK
syllable_count: 630.9 704.065955056 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.4593962918 60.3974514979 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.666666667 118.986275619 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.2666666667 23.4991977007 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.6 5.21951772744 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 10.2758426966 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 5.13820224719 175% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.45443748338 0.243740707755 186% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.168538668926 0.0831039109588 203% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.17293193069 0.0758088955206 228% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.304331247221 0.150359130593 202% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.179669346576 0.0667264976115 269% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 14.1392134831 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 48.8420337079 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 12.1743820225 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.7 12.1639044944 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.54 8.38706741573 102% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 100.480337079 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.