In certain countries government permit elder people to service till the age they wanted. I think in this case merits overshadow demerits due to many reasons as mentioned in essay.
Firstly, elder persons are not only aged people but also they have a lot of experience in respective fields. It is easier to take decisions, manage clients, chose the projects which are best for the firms growth. Having them is like moving company into the developing stage with jet speed. Next, in that age they need to support the family so if aged persons can have a job that will be more than happy for them. Old people have a huge experience subsequently this in return can help to train young persons, so if these two qualities combine at that point no own can stop the rapid growth. It would be better for the company to make them work with young employee to farm best outputs for the firm.
On the other hand, we do have some disadvantages of having elderly people in the system as they are old they probably do not know about latest technology so that was a drawback for the firm. As getting old means the pace will be decreased and require more time to complete the tasks. But mentioned downfalls are nothing when compared to advantages we have moreover there are solutions for this problems. Aged can be trained by the young in some areas related to new technology. Even though pace is slow and decelerating some persons can assist them in work to make things work in a better way.
To conclude, in my opinion advantages clearly overshadow disadvantages furthermore aged people experience is a massive treasure for the company as well as for country.
- Team activities can teach more skills for life than other activities which are played alone To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- Some countries allow old people to work to any age that they want Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 67
- Violent TV shows and aggressive video games should be banned on governmental level do you agree or disagree 73
- The table below shows the percentage of household and electronic goods in New Zealand in 2002 and 2020 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- the bar chart below gives information about the percentage of the population living in urban areas in different parts of the world 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 12, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'countries'' or 'country's'?
Suggestion: countries'; country's
In certain countries government permit elder people to servi...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 200, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'firms'' or 'firm's'?
Suggestion: firms'; firm's
...ose the projects which are best for the firms growth. Having them is like moving comp...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 131, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'about the latest'.
Suggestion: about the latest
... they are old they probably do not know about latest technology so that was a drawback for t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 390, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...e have moreover there are solutions for this problems. Aged can be trained by the yo...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, moreover, so, well, as for, i think, as well as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1361.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 291.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.67697594502 5.12529762239 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49631227405 2.80592935109 89% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.563573883162 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 431.1 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.3772670003 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.2142857143 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7857142857 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.92857142857 7.06120827912 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.251235987086 0.244688304435 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0833183300178 0.084324248473 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0715445906052 0.0667982634062 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.158209937418 0.151304729494 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0577954663095 0.056905535591 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.0946893788 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.86 12.4159519038 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.67 8.58950901804 89% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 78.4519038076 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.