Nowadays some individuals behave in an anti-society way, such as committing a crime. In general, it is the society to blame. What causes the anti-social behaviours of individuals? Who should be responsible for dealing with it?
It is no doubt true that in the information age, people tend to have many anti-society actions, such as committing a crime. In my opinion, there are a plethora of causes which lead to such a society and competent authorities and governments and their parents should be responsible for them.
Behaving in an anti-society way is growing day by day in society, to which many causes lead. Firstly, the new generation have lived in a growing-improved life since they were kids. This means that they were accepted by their parents for various requirements so they can be naughty adults if people in society can adapt to follow their wants. Secondly, the more the society opens, the more crime rates increase. This means that people usually ignore a couple of small offenses, which lead to an ever-increasing number of offenders who are jailed.
I reckon that competent authorities and governments should be responsible for this problem. Firstly, only both can control and enact new laws to reduce the crime rates in society. Therefore, if they can not control the number of criminals, the first people who should be responsible are governments and competent authorities. Besides that, parents also should have responsibility for their children because they have misled their children to become such a bad person.
In conclusion, I suppose that there are numerous causes to explain why such components appear in society. Both governments and competent authorities and their parents should be responsible for any actions which they can not control immediately.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-10-13 | hnhung | 61 | view |
| 2021-09-07 | Ranjeet brar | 84 | view |
- The diagram below describes the structure of a home smokery and how it works Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 66
- The line graph below shows the production of paper wood pulp and sawn wood in the UK from 1980 to 2000 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- Should we allow GM Food Give reasons to support your opinion 67
- Explain some of the ways in which humans are damaging the environment What can governments do to address these problems What can individual people do 73
- The line graph illustrates the proportion of total expenditure in a certain European country between 1960 and 2000 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, i reckon, i suppose, in conclusion, no doubt, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 41.998997996 60% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1306.0 1615.20841683 81% => OK
No of words: 252.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18253968254 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98428260373 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94410214927 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 125.0 176.041082164 71% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.496031746032 0.561755894193 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 402.3 506.74238477 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.3851022356 49.4020404114 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.461538462 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3846153846 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.4615384615 7.06120827912 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.255930062194 0.244688304435 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100383495821 0.084324248473 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0658450157355 0.0667982634062 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.176773413863 0.151304729494 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.06379422891 0.056905535591 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.96 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 78.4519038076 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.