Car ownership has increased so rapidly over the past thirty years that many cities in the world are now one big traffic jam?
How true do you think this statment is ?
What measures can government take to discourage people from using their cars?
Indubitably, over three decades there is prolific increase in the car ownership in the numerous cities of the globe. Apparently, I agree with the notion that this thing create large traffic congestion that is a burning issue and increased at an alarming rate. However, the comfort level, availability of loan and migrants all these blamed for it but there are myriad of plausible solutions to encounter it.
Fundamentally, this phenomena hold substantial contributing factors. First of all, in these days individuals prefer to stay in their comfort zone which highly influenced them. That is why, they give higher preference to purchase their private car. For instance, in my friend's home they are four members and they all have their own car. Therefore, individuals face big traffic James. Secondly, nowadays government provide easy loan alongwith lower interest. Thus, they give priority to purchase car. Resultantly, it automatically increased traffic.
Finally, is the ineffective facility of public transport make this situation worse? Certainly yes, because the majority of the residance from rural areas migrates to towns for their work and at that time they more prefer to use their own vehical. Consequently, it increased the number of vehicals. For example, in 2014 china experienced world's biggest traffic jam that remained for three days.
Nevertheless, this menace contain umpteen potential ways to curb it that is possible with the co-operation of authority. Chiefly, government should provide suitable facility of public transport especially in the rural areas. Majorly, it is necessary that administration again imposed the odd even policy. To vindicate, in the 2019, the Delhi government started the odd even policy as a result they witnessed 50% reduction in the traffic James. Allegedly, despite from regime efforts flok also encourage car pooling system. Henceforth, if all these measure should be taken then traffic is reduced.
To recapitulate, it can be reitrated that, four wheeler proprietorship sharply escalated because of plenty of reasons; whereas there are various measures to tackle with problem but even though it's permanent solution is out of reach.
- Some people work for the same organisation all their working life Others think that it is better to work for different organisations Discuss both the views and give your opinion 56
- Some experts believe that it is better for children to begin learning a foreign language at primary school Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages 56
- There was a time when people only shopped out of necessity but these days shopping seems to have become a new form of leisure activity People don t appreciate the value of money anymore To what extent do you agree with this view 61
- Some people work for the same organisation all their working life Others think that it is better to work for different organisations Discuss both the views and give your opinion 56
- Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology In what way has technology affected the types of relationships people Make Is this a positive or negative development 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 16, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...utions to encounter it. Fundamentally, this phenomena hold substantial contributing...
^^^^
Line 3, column 337, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'worlds the biggest'.
Suggestion: worlds the biggest
... For example, in 2014 china experienced worlds biggest traffic jam that remained for three day...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, consequently, finally, first, hence, however, if, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, thus, whereas, for example, for instance, as a result, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 24.0651302605 154% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1849.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 338.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.47041420118 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28774723029 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87693409095 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 212.0 176.041082164 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.627218934911 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 577.8 506.74238477 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 16.0721442886 137% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.4874622508 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.0454545455 106.682146367 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.3636363636 20.7667163134 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.77272727273 7.06120827912 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.207961002797 0.244688304435 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0552966765411 0.084324248473 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0385169261711 0.0667982634062 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101212314341 0.151304729494 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0370444563764 0.056905535591 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 50.2224549098 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.85 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.71 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 114.0 78.4519038076 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.