Scandals are something which have ruined the lifes and livelihood of the public figures throughout the world. They have soiled the reputation of not only the particular person but also of the one's who have no involvement in the wrongdoing. The author equates scandal to rumors and gossips in a way they are transmitted and in motivation of the people who propagates them. The issue accentuates the point that scandals are fueled by media and the ensuing frezy often obscures the actual meaning and depth of the reality.I have a strong discordant in the above issue and to what follows i'd elucidate my point further.
At the outset, there are myriad of reasons, where scandals have created deleterious effect in the life of the people. Scandals prey on society's fears and emotions and are thrived by the one's who believes in the spectacles hyped by the media. Like those who gives life to the salacious anecdote presented and judge people on the basis of such prepostereous rumors. For instance, media often dig on the personal life and past life of politicians and they will perturb their mental health which will eventually put a lag in doing good works for the overall betterment of the society.
The large scandals can be loosely defined irreparable damage to somebody's reputation caused by the real alleged immorality, but it also carries a wider meaning that the judgement has been rendered, fairly not based on deliberation of the capriciousness public.In other words, the very nature invites the abuse.
Scandals provide fodder for pundits, by brodcasting the news that are quite captivating which intrigues the readers, consumers and other general public. We are quite wary about the fact that scandals have always exacted a toll, so the consumers should have brief knowledge about the products before buying it. In addiition to it, government should be heedful about the rules and regulations, prevent people from getting scaammed. But in between all of these things real problems get obscured cause people are too busy nitpicking the stories that are funny and captivating.
To rebuttal, by the nature of human we are more reluctant and adamant about believing the real truth. This would certainly destroy the life of the people who are eminent and been in the public eye.
- Some people think that human needs for farmland housing and industry are more important than saving land for endangered animals Do you agree or disagree with this point of view Why or why not Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 76
- The first step to self knowledge is rejection of the familiar Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and supporting your po 70
- The following appeared in a memo from the director of a large group of hospitals quot In a controlled laboratory study of liquid hand soaps a concentrated solution of extra strength UltraClean hand soap produced a 40 percent greater reduction in harmful 77
- Should your government place a tax on the junk food and fatty snacks 75
- In any field of inquiry the beginner is more likely than the expert to make important contributions 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 520, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: I
...actual meaning and depth of the reality.I have a strong discordant in the above i...
^
Line 3, column 260, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: In
...liberation of the capriciousness public.In other words, the very nature invites th...
^^
Line 4, column 138, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...rigues the readers, consumers and other general public. We are quite wary about the fact that ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, for instance, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 14.8657303371 128% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 33.0505617978 61% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 58.6224719101 90% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1907.0 2235.4752809 85% => OK
No of words: 380.0 442.535393258 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01842105263 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41515443553 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61925932099 2.79657885939 94% => OK
Unique words: 213.0 215.323595506 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.560526315789 0.4932671777 114% => OK
syllable_count: 603.0 704.065955056 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.8647465119 60.3974514979 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.133333333 118.986275619 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.3333333333 23.4991977007 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.13333333333 5.21951772744 60% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 5.13820224719 175% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0932944352977 0.243740707755 38% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.03209494606 0.0831039109588 39% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0262026091262 0.0758088955206 35% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0455785620211 0.150359130593 30% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.029895541824 0.0667264976115 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 14.1392134831 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 48.8420337079 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 12.1743820225 107% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.1639044944 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.49 8.38706741573 113% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 100.480337079 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.8971910112 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.