The plans below show the layout of the ground floor of a museum in 1990 and in 2010.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The first picture illustrates the layout of the ground floor of a museum and the second picture shows some of proposed changes in the museum space in 1990 and in 2010. Overall, the significant change will be made in terms of the function of the rooms in the museum.
The most striking alteration has been to the right hand-side of the map where the Archaeology gallery has been converted into two separate rooms, the first room was called children’s interactive zone and the second room has been called Poster and display area. The gift shop near the stairs have been expanded in size and adding café in the service. At the same time, the natural history room and local history room have been remained over the year.
Another major change is the amenities od the first floor of the museum. The space between gift shop and natural local room has been used for a lift since 2010. However, the reception counter has been moved nearer to the entrance while the statue has been changed to the centre of the ground floor. The stairs opposite the entrance has been unchanged where the walk and the entrance of each rooms in the right hand-side of the map was removed. The last innovation of the museum was the entrance which has been doubled in size.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-08-04 | chauanhyeudau | 53 | view |
| 2021-11-08 | christine112 | 50 | view |
| 2023-10-29 | fatemeh1382 | 78 | view |
| 2023-06-28 | czefw13 | view |
- The picture illustrates the changes in Shipsmouth between 1995 and 2010 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- The plans show the change of a small theater in 2010 and 2012 61
- People are living longer after they retire What are the problems What can be done to solve these problems 73
- The figure shows demographic trends in Scotland Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features 11
- The two bar graphs show the number of marriages and divorces in the USA and marital status of adult American in 1970 and 2000 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, second, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 7.0 214% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1029.0 965.302439024 107% => OK
No of words: 222.0 196.424390244 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.63513513514 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8600083453 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.2106472549 2.65546596893 83% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.477477477477 0.547539520022 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 308.7 283.868780488 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 10.0 4.33902439024 230% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.7544518738 43.030603864 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.9 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.7 5.23603664747 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.118442550987 0.215688989381 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0566378775062 0.103423049105 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0713082163314 0.0843802449381 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104432375798 0.15604864568 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.082511958466 0.0819641961636 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.2329268293 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.63 11.4140731707 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.5 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.