Wealthy nations should assist poorer countries with humanitarian relief during natural disasters. Do you agree or disagree?
It is argued that developing states should be helped by rich nations with humane aid in times of natural calamities. This essay agrees with this statement because developed countries have outstanding human resources to give a hand to the underprivileged one.
To begin with, most of wealth countries count with special resources to overcome disasters. They also have a great technology system to forecast the meteorological conditions of weather, in order to prevent future incidents provoked by nature. Moreover, they have such a brilliant medical structure to respond with all needed materials in moments of pandemic and catastrophe. For that reason, the poorest always need their help. In addition, a recent study found that countries such as the United States have answered to countries like Philippines and Maldives sending supplies, medical units and rescue operations to tackle landslides and earthquakes disasters that continue affecting life conditions of the habitants.
Furthermore, developed nations have created a good image and a sense of collaboration to global level. They have showed a nice relationship to those who drastically face the lack of food and water supply, for the reason that, they do possess a higher capital and good materials for aid. For instance, neediest communities lack of these privileges due to millions are starving and they are forced to live in the absence of basic amenities. They do not own food, clothes and homes to live safe and healthy. Therefore, it is primary responsibility of each rich society to help needy
In conclusion, well financially countries should support pauper states with humanitarian assistance in disastrous events because they have the bare necessities and resources which benefit the needy and for anyone’s survival.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-10-24 | Nailesita | 78 | view |
| 2021-10-24 | Nailesita | 78 | view |
| 2021-03-03 | Premlatha KR | 55 | view |
| 2021-02-16 | Ankita91Sh | 56 | view |
| 2021-02-08 | orphism | 73 | view |
- Some people think that the government is wasting on the arts and that this money could be better spent elsewhere To what extent do you agree with this statement 61
- Parents should spend more time with their children helping them with their homework Do you agree or disagree 67
- Some people believe that money is the major source of happiness Do you agree or disagree 76
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task Your neighbors have recently written to you to complain about the noise from your house flat Write a letter to your neighbors In your letter explain the reasons for the noise Apologize describe what action yo 78
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task Your neighbors have recently written to you to complain about the noise from your house flat Write a letter to your neighbors In your letter explain the reasons for the noise Apologize describe what action yo 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 300, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: ', the neediest'.
Suggestion: , the neediest
...and good materials for aid. For instance, neediest communities lack of these privileges du...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 580, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ility of each rich society to help needy In conclusion, well financially countrie...
^^^^^
Line 8, column 226, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...it the needy and for anyone’s survival.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, if, moreover, so, therefore, well, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1523.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 279.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.45878136201 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96396483621 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.620071684588 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 477.0 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 75.7670039588 49.4020404114 153% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.916666667 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.25 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.83333333333 7.06120827912 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.171217727924 0.244688304435 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0587585379767 0.084324248473 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0511236616159 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111367034275 0.151304729494 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0490942909467 0.056905535591 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.68 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.49 8.58950901804 122% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.