It is obviously right that household waste is not recycled properly and completely. Although I admit that legal regulations to force people to recycle is helpful in this situation, I totally disagree that imposing a new legal law is the only way that governments should take into considerations.
In my opinion, a new requirement for recycling can be just one possible method to deal with the waste issue. The governments make it a legal obligation for homeowners to classify all waste into different bins and put them into the right bins. If people who fail to follow this rule, they will be punished by paying a considerable fine or engaging in community service. Moreover, the authorities take repeat offenders out of court and put them in the jails for their actions. These measures can be a deterrent and encourage people to observe the law. As a result, the homeholders improve the behavior as well as the environment is cleaner and fresher.
However, I strongly think that there can be more methods for government can do than they just simply enact a law. One of the best measure for recycling the authorities can do is that they raise awareness of citizens, especially children through education which is the heart of the recycling campaign. For instance, children can be taught about the importance of recycling in schools and homeowners can be well-formed about the serious influences on the environment if household waste cannot be handled. Another measure that governments can introduce stricter requirements on companies and factories so that the companies follow the rule that protecting the environment is a priority. The other method can be carried out by the authorities is that they can invest a large amount of money into enhancing the efficiency of recycling systems and building many facilities to reprocess rubbish.
To sum up, it is undeniable that introduce of new legislation can make people improve their behavior but there are some better methods that need to be considered in to improve the situation.
- Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste 73
- At the present time the population of some countries includes a relatively large number of young adults compared with the number of older people Do you think that the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages 84
- In some cultures children are often told that they can achieve anything if they try hard enough What are the advantages and disadvantages of giving children this massage 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, moreover, so, well, for instance, as a result, as well as, in my opinion, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1705.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 336.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0744047619 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28139028586 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92599183477 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.514880952381 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 538.2 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.3062644167 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.785714286 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.21428571429 7.06120827912 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.30494488921 0.244688304435 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106881911808 0.084324248473 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0589460022312 0.0667982634062 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.196885827071 0.151304729494 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0517735775841 0.056905535591 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.49 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.