The line graph compares three regions, namely Australia, Canada, and European Community in terms of wheat export index between 1985 and 1990.
Overall, while the number of wheat exported in Canada and Europe countries had a tendency to increase at the end of the examined period, the opposite was true for Australia. Meanwhile, the data of Canadian wheat exports dramatically fluctuated rather than the other areas.
It can be seen that Canada was the number-one country regarding exporting wheat over the period of the first 4 years with approximately 20 million tones in 1985. This figure slightly decreased after 1 year before reaching a peak at 25 million tones in 1988. Similarly, the year 1988 also witnessed the marginally rose in the total wheat exports in European Community at exactly 15 million tones after experiencing a declining period within the first 3 years. In contrast, the trend was reversed in the figure for Australia, with 15 million tones at the beginning of the period, then grew by only 1 million tones, followed by substantial decline at 17 units in 1988.
Furthermore, from 1988 to 1990, there was a significant difference in the export index of wheat in 3 countries. While Australia continued to export wheat less and ending with around 10 million tones in 1990, the wheat imports from Canada tended to grow in 1989 and 1990, with 19 and 21 million tones, respectively. Besides that, the wheat production used for exporting in European Community went through a huge fluctuation, starting with sharp decrease and falling into the bottom at 14 million tones, and then increased by 5 million tones at 19 million tones at the end of the period.
- The diagram below describes how stormwater is recycled in an Australian city 61
- the table below highlight data on the number of travellers using three major British airport between 1998 and 2003 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The diagram below shows the recycling process of plastics 10
- The chart below gives information about oil production capacity Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The table below shows the worldwide market share of the notebook computer market for manufacturers in the years 2006 and 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, first, furthermore, if, regarding, similarly, so, then, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 33.7804878049 166% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1393.0 965.302439024 144% => OK
No of words: 280.0 196.424390244 143% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.975 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 3.73543355544 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68354538183 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 106.607317073 141% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.535714285714 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 408.6 283.868780488 144% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 53.1564671512 43.030603864 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.3 112.824112599 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.0 22.9334400587 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.9 5.23603664747 170% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.163453646685 0.215688989381 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0843581525348 0.103423049105 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0644802556182 0.0843802449381 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117234793222 0.15604864568 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.03768390859 0.0819641961636 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.2329268293 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.86 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 40.7170731707 167% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.