The graph below shows the contribution of three sectors - agriculture, manufacturing and business and financial services - to the UK economy in the twentieth century.Summarize the information...
The chart illustrates the proportion of agriculture, manufacturing and business and financial services in the UK economy during a period from 1900 to 2000. Overall, there was downward trends in the contribution from agricultural and manufacture activities, while it is witnessed an opposite trend in the contribution of business and financial services to the economy of UK.
In 1900, agriculture sector which took up nearly a half of total contribution was the main role in UK economy. The proportion of agriculture slightly increased from 1900 to 1950 and accounted for over a half in 1950 then dropped rapidly and hit its lowest point of only 3% in 2000, became the least contribution in the economy. Manufacturing sector which was in second position in 1900 experienced a noticeable decline in the proportion from 1900 to 2000 (from 48% to 20%). The accounting for nearly a fifth in the economy helped manufacturing still was in the second position in contribution.
On the other hand, the percentage of business and financial services which accounted for only a small fraction and was the smallest contribution in 1900 grew gradually in the following century. It got into the first position in the UK economy 2000 and comprised approximately 40% of economy.
- Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 73
- The graph below shows the contribution of three sectors agriculture manufacturing and business and financial services to the UK economy in the twentieth century Summarize the information 67
- Some people think that hosting an international sports event is good for the country while some people think it is bad Discuss both views and state your opinion Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or expe 78
- The graph below shows average carbon dioxide CO2 emissions per person in the United Kingdom Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, second, still, then, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 3.97073170732 327% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1062.0 965.302439024 110% => OK
No of words: 206.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15533980583 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78849575616 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15586254072 2.65546596893 119% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.47572815534 0.547539520022 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 327.6 283.868780488 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.4768198054 43.030603864 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.75 112.824112599 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.75 22.9334400587 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.625 5.23603664747 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.259533056164 0.215688989381 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.1320671539 0.103423049105 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0826860692157 0.0843802449381 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.205860254379 0.15604864568 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0940562316029 0.0819641961636 115% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.2329268293 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 61.2550243902 75% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 6.51609756098 200% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.02 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 11.4329268293 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.