The bar charts below show the percentages of men and women in employment in three countries in 2005 and 2015.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The information plotted in the given bar charts presents a comparison of the hiring percentages of men and women in 2005 and 2015, between three countries: Canada, South Korea and Sweden.
According to the graphic, in each of the three countries, the males' rates in employment outweighed the female ones. Even though this is noticeable in both years, in 2005, the difference in figures between the two genders was considerably prominent. For instance, in Sweeden, the female rate was approximately 45%, while males nearly reached 80%.
Also, Sweeden peaked in the first position in 2015, having the highest hiring rates, followed by South Korea with around 75%, and Canada with just over 60%. However, in 2015, the rate in South Korea rose slightly to almost 80%, while the others tied on the second place, at 70%.
Overall, the hiring rates for females showed a significant rise in figures from 2005 to 2015. Still, in each of the three countries, they were far lower than the male ones.
- An effective health care system should encourage people to take preventive measures against illness and disease rather than encourage them to rely on treatment To what extent do you agree with this statement 86
- The diagram illustrates how bees produce honey Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- More and more parents are allowing their children to play on computers and tablets as they think that children should learn technology skills Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages 78
- The graph shows the number of visitors to four international museums between 1980 and 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 89
- Some people believe that children can be better educated by being taught at home rather than by attending lessons at school To what extent do you agree with this idea 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, second, so, still, while, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 831.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 167.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.97604790419 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.59483629437 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47195898687 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.622754491018 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 237.6 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.510259623 43.030603864 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.875 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.875 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 5.23603664747 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.173240857944 0.215688989381 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0752548467687 0.103423049105 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0956732916767 0.0843802449381 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124363295508 0.15604864568 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.113106332388 0.0819641961636 138% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.88 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.