Nowadays many people imitate others who live in foreign countries. So some conventional habits are disappearing around th world. Although there are some advantages of the being the same culture, I strongly feel that imittating effects negatively people's lives.
On the one hand, people can learn easily other nations' culture due to development of technology in our century. Especially, if someone wants to purchase a new clothe, he will find modern styles on the internet. It is true that the most people try to copy others' habits who live in developed countries and it may cause to create new things in developing areas. For instance, soebody had saw a super collection in abroad and he made this kind of product for local residents in his country. In fact, every year art galleries are hold in European countries in order to share their opinion with others. After that participants of gallery may manufacture unique products in their own place and contribute to be seen a significant increase in textile industry.
On the other hand, being the same of cultural habits leads to lose national traditions and habits. To examplfy, if people desire to buy foreign clothes, local products will not be sold as usual and the number of factories will decline considerably in this area. Another main factor is that imitating other nations causes to address the problem which is dependent on people's behaviour and religion. It is clear that there are a lot of religions over the world and they arenot the same. So doing other nations' culture may not be appropriate for local population. I personally believe that everyone should keep on traditional habits as older generation did.
In conclusion, being the same culture is more negative and people should try to continue national culture and habits around the world.
- At the present time the population of some countries includes a relatively large number of young adults compared with the number of older people Do the advantages of this situation outweigh the disadvantages 92
- Nowadays culture is much the same all around the world when compared to previous times Do you think this a positive or negative development 92
- Some employers reward members of staff for their exceptional contributions to the company by giving them extra money this practice can act as an incentive for some but may also have a negative impact on others To what extent is this style of management ef 81
- The graphs below show the number of men and women in full and part time employment in Australia between 1973 and 1993 Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below 84
- Scientist have been warning for many years that to protect our environment we have to limit use of energy in our daily lives despite warning many people do not pay attention to this What are the reasons and how people can encourage to save environment 87
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 318, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'creating'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'cause' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: creating
...in developed countries and it may cause to create new things in developing areas. For ins...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 386, Rule ID: HAD_VBP[1]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'sawed', 'sawn', 'seen'.
Suggestion: sawed; sawn; seen
...loping areas. For instance, soebody had saw a super collection in abroad and he mad...
^^^
Line 2, column 386, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'sawed', 'sawn', 'seen'.
Suggestion: sawed; sawn; seen
...loping areas. For instance, soebody had saw a super collection in abroad and he mad...
^^^
Line 3, column 321, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'addressing'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'cause' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: addressing
... is that imitating other nations causes to address the problem which is dependent on peopl...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, may, so, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, kind of, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1512.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 301.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02325581395 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16525528304 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66825603934 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.591362126246 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 486.0 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.3813650738 49.4020404114 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.5 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8125 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.875 7.06120827912 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.152335953065 0.244688304435 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.052836143641 0.084324248473 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0537107396868 0.0667982634062 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118850048887 0.151304729494 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0580481959458 0.056905535591 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.04 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.