The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in Malaysia and Japan in the year 2010.
The given charts illustrate the average of money which people in 2 countries spent in 2010 on 5 kinds of household, namely Japan and Malaysia.
In general, what stands out from the graph is that people in Malaysia spent on other goods and services made up the largest percentage of money in total. It is clear to see that the proportion of transport expenditure was the lowest in both charts.
When it comes to Japan, the housing expenditure which made up 29% in 2010 was the most popular percentage in 2010. This is 8% higher than the percentage of money which people spent on other goods and services and 5% more than the figure for food. In the meantime, the proportion of health care expenditure was 20%, which was more than 3 times as high as the figure for transport, at 6%.
Looking at Malaysia's chart, the proportion of the other goods and services expenditure was 34%. Besides that, the percentage of money which people in Malaysia spent on food was 27%, which was only 1% higher than the figure for housing. Finally, the proportion of transport expenditure was the least common expenditure in 2010, at 3%.
- The first chart below shows the value of goods that Australia imported from China and those exported to China from Australia The second chart shows the types of goods imported from China Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main featur 84
- Competitiveness is a positive quality for people in most societies How does competitiveness affect individuals Is it a positive or negative trend 73
- In many parts of the world people rely on private cars for transportation In what ways does reliance on private cars affect the way we live Do the effects tend to be positive or negative 67
- Some people believe that sport has an important role in society Others however think that it is nothing more than a leisure activity for some people Discuss both views and give your own opinion 61
- The maps below show the Hogwards Grammar School in 2004 and in 2010 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, finally, look, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 3.15609756098 317% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 924.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 197.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.69035532995 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74642080493 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55183072266 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.477157360406 0.547539520022 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 270.0 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 21.6487105082 43.030603864 50% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 102.666666667 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8888888889 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.77777777778 5.23603664747 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.194426660829 0.215688989381 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106567849031 0.103423049105 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0943562600737 0.0843802449381 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155326242559 0.15604864568 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0944588359445 0.0819641961636 115% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.92 11.4140731707 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.16 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.