The best way for governments to solve the problem of traffic congestion is providing free public transport 24 hours per day, and seven days a week. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Since the demand for mobility has increased dramatically, traffic congestion is now considered to be an inevitable problem. Governments recently suggest that a definite chief aim to handle this is to offer complimentary 24-hour public transportation for fully seven days per week. I am completely on board with this solution.
Firstly, public transits have such a huge capacity that they allow more people to travel. It is vividly acknowledged that buses, subways, commuters trains, etc. have bigger dimensions than an individual car. Moreover, statistics have shown traveling by public transportation, a person can reduce his or her chance of being in an accident by more than 90%, compared to commuting by automobile. Hence, individuals who traversed by means of public transport would be safer, as well as give a helping hand in containing the quantities of vehicles being driven on the road.
Furthermore, that authority provides free public transportation means people from all different walks of life are allowed to use public transit without paying any fare. This can help them financially economize their expenditure, which they would be capable of adapting to a more satisfying life. Therefore, a complimentary public transporting system will be a reasonable way of traveling for all purposes. One, for example, would save up to a hundred dollars spending on vehicle-related expenses such as petrol, road taxes, etc.
In conclusion, if governments implemented this solution, traffic congestion would soon drop. People, however, need to take into consideration commuting by public transport, instead of traveling by individual vehicles in order to support the authority’s aim.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-12-18 | nguyenanh9182 | 78 | view |
- The charts below show the main reasons for study among students of different age groups and how they are supported by their employers 78
- The charts show the sources of the electricity produced in 4 countries between 2003 and 2008 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The world of work is rapidly changing and employees cannot depend on having the same job or the same working conditions for life Why is it the case Can you suggest some ways to prepare people to work in the future 89
- The bar chart shows expectations for change of European young people in the next 20 years in five different areas 89
- The charts show what Australian school leavers did immediately after leaving secondary school Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, hence, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, well, for example, in conclusion, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 10.4138276553 10% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1439.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 259.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.55598455598 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01166760082 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.20758574504 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.667953667954 0.561755894193 119% => OK
syllable_count: 443.7 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.1164027369 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.785714286 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.07142857143 7.06120827912 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.213098260162 0.244688304435 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.067121146899 0.084324248473 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.082535863944 0.0667982634062 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137968887026 0.151304729494 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0919719234079 0.056905535591 162% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.97 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.22 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.