Some people work for the same organization all their working life. Others think that it is better to work for different organizations.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Opinions diverge on whether in the entire life, a worker should work for only one company or distinct companies. In my own mindset, I extremely support people to do in one organization although there seem to be some drawbacks existing in light of some radiation reasons.
Admittedly, working for myriad companies has advantages with the experience as well as relationships. The more jobs a person does, the more experienced he is. It is easy to understand that each job contains its own skills and required level so that the person reaching all of these may be all-purpose. Furthermore, an all-purpose worker not only can be capable of applying all the life experience in myriad fields but also easily help other people solve difficult problems. Second, you can make friends with many people. Conspicuously, accessing in different working environments make you be more sociable because of the large number of collages from EACH company. Hence, these relationships help you in private life such as lending you money, advising you on some jobs when you are unemployed.
On the other hand, notwithstanding these aforementioned advantages of multi-job worker upsides, the single one's override with the salary and productivity. When you do a job for many years, you will get used to it. People accumulate experience each time when their job is concerned, they realize the mistakes they make and try hard to fix them. So time by the time it becomes huge like a dictionary, and they will be more and more productive in that job. Moreover, their salary is higher by years. Their contribution to the organization is impossible to negate, the money given to them conspicuously leaps each year. That amount of money can be extremely useful for whole life afterward.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-03-25 | cinderel | 56 | view |
| 2023-03-05 | hahannguyen | 73 | view |
| 2022-08-24 | Nguyen Thi Thanh Xuan | 73 | view |
| 2022-04-24 | Lunar Tran | 73 | view |
| 2022-04-24 | Lunar Tran | 73 | view |
- In some countries more and more people becoming interested in finding out about the history of the house or building they live in What are reasons for this How can people research this 88
- It is not realistic for people to expect to work at the same company or employer all of their life Do you agree or disagree with the following statement 89
- Some people say that devoting one s time to family activities is more important than spending time working Others believe that dedicating one s time to work is more important Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
- Some people argue that we should do research into their family history Others agree with the view that we should focus on the present and future generations Discuss both views and give your own opinion 84
- As the number of cars increases more money has to be spent on road systems Some people think the government should pay for this Others however think that the user should cover the costs Discuss and give your opinion 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 132, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r distinct companies. In my own mindset, I extremely support people to do in one ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, hence, if, may, moreover, second, so, well, such as, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1472.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 291.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.05841924399 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95489088135 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.584192439863 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 472.5 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.9693101602 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.0 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1875 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.625 7.06120827912 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.38176352705 68% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.229934991752 0.244688304435 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0713836571084 0.084324248473 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0538663641112 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.170224930685 0.151304729494 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0537275746776 0.056905535591 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.0946893788 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.33 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.