The graph below shows average carbon dioxide emissions per person in the United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.
The given line graph compares average carbon dioxide emissions per person in four European countries during the period of 40 years.
It can be seen that the highest figures of carbon dioxide emissions were always in the United Kingdom, but the statistics in this country tended to decrease continuously. In contrast, the numbers in Italy and Portugal increased dramatically.
To be more specific, the figure of carbon dioxide emissions per person in the UK was almost 11 tonnes, which was the highest. However, this number grew down over the years, with just 9 tonnes in 2007. Moreover, the statistics in Sweden reached the peak in 1977, with nearly 11 tonnes, which was almost two times higher than this country’s figure in 1997.
According to the line chart, the statistics of carbon dioxide in Portugal were always lowest. The figure in Portugal in 1967 was approximately 2 ton while the number in Italy at the same time was two times less than. Additionally, the statistics in Portugal and Italy increased continuously, from more than 2 tonnes and 6 tonnes in 1977 to 6 tonnes and 8 tonnes in 2007 correspondingly.
- Some people say that the only reason for learning a foreign language is in order to travel or work in a foreign country Others say that these are not the only reasons why someone should learn a foreign language 73
- The table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Many people say that universities should only offer places to young students with highest marks others say they should accept people with all ages even if they did not do well at school 73
- The graph below shows average carbon dioxide emissions per person in the United Kingdom Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007 73
- The charts below show the percentage of water used for different purposes in six areas of the world Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r than this country’s figure in 1997. According to the line chart, the statist...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, moreover, so, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 949.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 189.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02116402116 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70779275107 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78378287658 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.529100529101 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 280.8 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.7888181723 43.030603864 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.444444444 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.55555555556 5.23603664747 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.290192814964 0.215688989381 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.118516077556 0.103423049105 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0689453055399 0.0843802449381 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.186681631208 0.15604864568 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0546843103764 0.0819641961636 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.2329268293 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.85 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.