Research has shown that the transportation of products and people are the main source of pollution. Some people believe the government is responsible for it, while others believe it is the fault of individuals. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Opinions diverge on whether the main source of pollution from traffic activities and people is believed to be the government responsible. Although this sentiment can be justified to some certain extent, I believe that individuals bear more responsibility in this situation.
Admittedly, the massive transportation and the public's lack of awareness about the pollution problems are due to the government's incompetence and inadequate solutions. This can be explained that all the factories, companies, vehicles or the transportation of products are under government’s monitor, so they can know all the information about the level and cause of pollution in any areas. Thus, they are the only ones who can give reasonable opinions and solutions to solve these problems. In addition, if the governments do not have any effective measures to increase the awareness of their residents, people will not care about environmental protection as well as lack of information about how much harmful emissions their vehicles are emitting which can lead to dangerous problems later on. As a result, the government will hold responsible for the problems.
Conversely, I ascertain that this escalating issue is closely related to individual consciousness. Perceptibly, vehicles release a large amount of hazardous waste into the environment, in order to lessen people’s environmental impact, they will have to reduce using gas-powered vehicle which is a difficult activity because safe means of transport for the environment are not yet widely available. Moreover, the government’s remedies will be useless without the coordination of people. Regardless of government efforts in some areas in promoting environmental protection by putting plenty of banners and to use environmental materials or change to use electrical vehicles, a large part of citizen still does not show their interest or willingness about these topics. This suggests that environmental problems from transportation of products and people occur mainly from the lack of awareness of a few individuals.
In conclusion, individuals do a disservice to environment, so they have to be responsible in solving the environmental pollution problems.
- The pie charts below show units of electricity production by fuel source in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- The pie charts below show units of electricity production by fuel source in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- As we are facing more and more problems which affect the whole planet good relationships between different countries are becoming more important than ever before To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 56
- The charts give information about world forest in five different regions
- The diagram below shows how electricity is generated in a hydroelectric power station Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 118, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'governments'' or 'government's'?
Suggestion: governments'; government's
...t the pollution problems are due to the governments incompetence and inadequate solutions. ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, if, moreover, so, still, thus, well, in addition, in conclusion, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 22.0 8.3376753507 264% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1871.0 1615.20841683 116% => OK
No of words: 331.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.65256797583 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26537283232 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.38057690584 2.80592935109 120% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.540785498489 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 593.1 506.74238477 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 78.7493214022 49.4020404114 159% => OK
Chars per sentence: 143.923076923 106.682146367 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.4615384615 20.7667163134 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.69230769231 7.06120827912 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.230808558962 0.244688304435 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0901977298835 0.084324248473 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0678866948359 0.0667982634062 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152831763296 0.151304729494 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0784084140902 0.056905535591 138% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.9 13.0946893788 137% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.18 50.2224549098 58% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.79 12.4159519038 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.6 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.78957915832 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 118, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'governments'' or 'government's'?
Suggestion: governments'; government's
...t the pollution problems are due to the governments incompetence and inadequate solutions. ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, if, moreover, so, still, thus, well, in addition, in conclusion, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 22.0 8.3376753507 264% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1871.0 1615.20841683 116% => OK
No of words: 331.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.65256797583 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26537283232 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.38057690584 2.80592935109 120% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.540785498489 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 593.1 506.74238477 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 78.7493214022 49.4020404114 159% => OK
Chars per sentence: 143.923076923 106.682146367 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.4615384615 20.7667163134 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.69230769231 7.06120827912 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.230808558962 0.244688304435 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0901977298835 0.084324248473 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0678866948359 0.0667982634062 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152831763296 0.151304729494 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0784084140902 0.056905535591 138% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.9 13.0946893788 137% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.18 50.2224549098 58% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.79 12.4159519038 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.6 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.78957915832 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.