Influence of human beings on the world's ecosystem is leading to the extinction of species and loss of bio-diversity.
What are the primary causes of loss of bio-diversity? What solutions can you suggest?
The extinction of flora and fauna and the degradation of biodiversity, being as one of the most hotly debated topics worldwide, are currently attributed to the impact of humankind on the world’s ecosystem. This essay would indicate the root causes that have greatly contributed to this problem and then propose certain measures to radically address it.
In terms of the running reasons for the devastation of species and biodiversity, overexploitation is perhaps the decisive factor. This is mainly derived from the fact that the populating explosion boosts more demands for materials from animals and plants - the prerequisite of the manufacturing sector. Besides that, the rapid growth of population also correlates with an upsurge in demand for accommodation and other amenities, as the area of hospitable land on Earth is limited; for instance, the globe comprises one-fourth of the land surface while the remaining are oceans, which explains why a starling amount of land is required for inhabitants. For example, in some regions, forests are being cut down to make room for residential areas and recreational facilities, resulting in the loss of natural habitats for native flora and fauna.
Regarding feasible solutions to properly tackle this intense issue, it is indispensable for the governor to put a strict legislation system for conserving living creatures and biodiversity into practice immediately. For the world at large, should the use of species for industry be restricted to a moderating level, the animals and plants will not be on the verge of extinction. Furthermore, to remedy the severity of this problem, the state leader needs to channel their expenditure and effort into upgrading housing infrastructures to satisfy the needs of their citizens. More attempts and budgets should be prudent for erecting accommodations that can make the best use of land.
In conclusion, as for the aforementioned explanations, the extinction of species and loss of biodiversity result from overconsumption and the destruction of species’ habitats; however, this dilemma can be resolved by adopting strict regulations and building complex residential areas.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-09-06 | levanhoan123 | 78 | view |
| 2022-06-21 | minhtran224 | 80 | view |
| 2022-03-06 | Cena | 67 | view |
| 2022-01-21 | lennie.butera | 84 | view |
| 2021-11-16 | christine112 | 61 | view |
- Some people think governments should spend money on faster means of public transport However others think money should be spent on other priorities ex cost environment Discuss both views and give opinions 84
- The world should have only one government rather than a national government for each country Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 78
- It is suggested that primary children should learn how to grow vegetables and keep animals Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 78
- Some people think that the most important thing about being rich is it gives a person the opportunity to help other people Do you agree or disagree 61
- People in many countries are spending less time with their families What are the reasons and effects of this 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 682, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ons that can make the best use of land. In conclusion, as for the aforementioned...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, furthermore, however, regarding, so, then, while, as for, for example, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1840.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 334.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.50898203593 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27500489853 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.20420474476 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.59880239521 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 577.8 506.74238477 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 20.2975951904 148% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 66.3105640836 49.4020404114 134% => OK
Chars per sentence: 167.272727273 106.682146367 157% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.3636363636 20.7667163134 146% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.7272727273 7.06120827912 152% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.104070394736 0.244688304435 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0449514295818 0.084324248473 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0433340747603 0.0667982634062 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0788766416618 0.151304729494 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0390276831683 0.056905535591 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.7 13.0946893788 150% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.57 50.2224549098 65% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 11.3001002004 143% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.27 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.94 8.58950901804 127% => OK
difficult_words: 123.0 78.4519038076 157% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.78957915832 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.1190380762 138% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.