For school children, their teachers have more influence on their intelligence and social development than their parents. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is sometimes argued that education tutors play an important role in the influence of school children’s intelligence as well as their social skills progression. Personally, I strongly agree with this view.
It is understandable why some believe that parents have more influence than teachers on children's intelligence quotient and their social development. The principal reason for this is that there is a family bond between parents and their children which makes parents understand them easier than teachers. As a result, parents are able to advise their children easily since it is much more comfortable for children to listen to suggestions from family members. However, I believe that this view is flawed. In fact, it will be difficult for parents to understand their child’s daily life completely as children spend most of their time learning at school which minimizes the interaction between children and their parents.
In addition, I am strongly convinced that teachers are the key factor contributing to children's improvement in both mentals as well as social skills. This is because education guiders are trained to impart their knowledge to learners by giving them a suitable teaching method. Take chemistry, for example, it will be difficult for learners to understand the subject completely if their mentor does not deliver an effective lecture. Furthermore, teachers are guided to deliver motivational speech affecting positively to learners' emotions. Take the principal leadership course, for example, teachers are aimed to inspire their students to change their behavior by giving them an inspirational talk. As a result, this helps students to change their characters as well as mindset positively.
In conclusion, there are sufficient grounds to reject the view that parents make more impact on their children. It is my genuine belief that teachers are the key to students’ improvement in both intelligence and social activities.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-31 | chips_0506 | 87 | view |
| 2022-10-31 | phuongchi17899 | 61 | view |
| 2022-08-02 | doquytuan | 61 | view |
| 2022-08-02 | doquytuan | 56 | view |
| 2022-02-21 | phuongchi17899 | 61 | view |
- Some people say that economic growth is the only way to end hunger and poverty while others say that economic growth is damaging the environment so it must be stopped Discuss both views and give your opinion 67
- The table below shows the percentage of the population by age groups in one town who rode bicycles in 2011 78
- The diagrams show the cross sections of two tunnels one joining France and Italy and the other joining two Japanese Islands 73
- The only way to improve road safety is to give much stricter punishments on driving offenses To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- The diagram below gives the information about the Hawaiian island chain in the centre of the Pacific Ocean Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown 60
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 125, Rule ID: BOTH_AS_WELL_AS[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'and' after 'both'.
Suggestion: and
...o childrens improvement in both mentals as well as social skills. This is because educatio...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, if, so, well, for example, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 24.0651302605 158% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1665.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 303.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.49504950495 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9734563323 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.514851485149 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 497.7 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.2334212509 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.0 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.6 7.06120827912 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.474768848617 0.244688304435 194% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.160006354966 0.084324248473 190% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.111686020948 0.0667982634062 167% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.287740157314 0.151304729494 190% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0933597699744 0.056905535591 164% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.62 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.75 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 125, Rule ID: BOTH_AS_WELL_AS[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'and' after 'both'.
Suggestion: and
...o childrens improvement in both mentals as well as social skills. This is because educatio...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, if, so, well, for example, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 24.0651302605 158% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1665.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 303.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.49504950495 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9734563323 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.514851485149 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 497.7 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.2334212509 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.0 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.6 7.06120827912 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.474768848617 0.244688304435 194% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.160006354966 0.084324248473 190% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.111686020948 0.0667982634062 167% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.287740157314 0.151304729494 190% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0933597699744 0.056905535591 164% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.62 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.75 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.