The bar chart depicts the proportion of individuals who visited the movie theaters on seven days of the week in a specific nation of Europe between 2003 and 2007.
Looking at the graph, it is immediately evident that there was a small fluctuation in people’s preferences for which day to go to the cinemas. Additionally, people in this country tended to see movies on the weekends rather than working days.
In 2003, 40% of movie-goers attended to cinemas on Saturday, compared to 30% on Friday and Sunday. On the other days, the proportion of peple going to cinemas was higher on Tuesday, at 20%, while the lowest figure can be seen on Monday, at only 10%.
By the next four years, the percentage of individuals who went to cinemas on weekends climbed by around 5%, to 45% on Saturday and 35% on Sunday. Similar, Thursday and Monday became popular among the cinema-goers, with roughly 2% more people opting for these day. Howver, fewer people tended to see movies on Tuesday, with the figure failing to, 19% and 9% respectively. Finally, there was stability, at 30%, in proportion of movie-goers choosing to go to the movie theaters on a holiday.
- The chart below shows information about fuel used in the transport sector in different countries in Europe compared to the EU average in 2009 and 2010 89
- The bar shows the percentage of people going to cinemas in one European country on different days 95
- Some people think spoken communication is more powerful than written communication To what extent do you agree or disagree 93
- The chart below shows waste collection by a recycling centre from 2011 to 2015 87
- Some people think planning future is a waste of time and people should focus on the present To what extent do you agree or disagree 81
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 254, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this day' or 'these days'?
Suggestion: this day; these days
... with roughly 2% more people opting for these day. Howver, fewer people tended to see mov...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, if, look, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 33.7804878049 139% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 962.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 199.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.83417085427 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75589349951 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73622589495 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 106.607317073 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.603015075377 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 282.6 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 3.36585365854 297% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 22.6819120844 43.030603864 53% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 106.888888889 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1111111111 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.66666666667 5.23603664747 51% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.205793032525 0.215688989381 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0804563530079 0.103423049105 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0326304083861 0.0843802449381 39% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119836497622 0.15604864568 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0399807752718 0.0819641961636 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.73 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.3 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.