Some people think it is more important to spend money on roads and motorways than on public transport systems. To what extend do you agree?
Investment in transportation is a major concern for many individuals. There is a notion that the authorities should allocate more funds for the construction of roads and motorways rather than the development of public transportation. This essay totally agrees with the mentioned idea for several reasons.
To begin with, transport infrastructure should be prioritized because the operation of conveyances, including public vehicles, relies heavily on the quality of roads and motorways. The development of roadway systems is indeed an essential prerequisite for the coordination of numerous forms of transport from motorbikes, cars, and trucks to buses. South Korea is an outstanding example. This country, where the vast majority of citizens are pedestrians and public transport commuters, has always put great emphasis on building and maintaining a reliable system of roads.
Furthermore, the advancement of roads and motorways is significantly crucial since this is an effective measure to tackle accidents and congestions. Promoting the quality of roadways helps ensure travel smoothness and safety while expanding thoroughfares enables vehicles to move more easily and be better controlled even during peak hours. The costs of negligence in constructing high-quality roads include increased mortality from car accidents and disrupted delivery of passengers and goods, for instance, and consequently, lead to serious economic losses. Therefore, this ought to be one of the first and foremost focuses of investment.
In conclusion, my firm conviction is that allotting money to roads and motorways is of greater importance than distributing budgets to public transport due to the fundamental role of roadways in the whole conveying system as well as the demand to deal with various traffic problems.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-06-18 | Huyenlbg87 | 89 | view |
| 2023-02-01 | tieuquynh | 89 | view |
| 2022-12-07 | thanhtu000 | 78 | view |
| 2022-09-10 | Charles Le | 78 | view |
| 2022-05-14 | paulha1107 | 73 | view |
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, furthermore, if, so, therefore, well, while, for instance, in conclusion, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 7.0 24.0651302605 29% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1543.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 269.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.73605947955 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0498419064 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.23743802431 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.624535315985 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 466.2 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 68.6415811784 49.4020404114 139% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.583333333 106.682146367 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4166666667 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.4166666667 7.06120827912 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.22359275533 0.244688304435 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0704679053163 0.084324248473 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0644483799486 0.0667982634062 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139871584569 0.151304729494 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0571984511232 0.056905535591 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.31 12.4159519038 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.48 8.58950901804 122% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, furthermore, if, so, therefore, well, while, for instance, in conclusion, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 7.0 24.0651302605 29% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1543.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 269.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.73605947955 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0498419064 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.23743802431 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.624535315985 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 466.2 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 68.6415811784 49.4020404114 139% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.583333333 106.682146367 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4166666667 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.4166666667 7.06120827912 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.22359275533 0.244688304435 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0704679053163 0.084324248473 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0644483799486 0.0667982634062 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139871584569 0.151304729494 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0571984511232 0.056905535591 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.31 12.4159519038 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.48 8.58950901804 122% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.