Some people think that children under 18 years old should receive full-time education. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
There is currently a contentious argument over whether children under 18 years old should be taught full-time academic experience. I somewhat agree with this opinion because such education can reduce the rate of juvenile delinquency and it can bring both cultural and financial advantages for a country; however, many rural and remote households cannot afford for their offspring to receive full-time education and in some poor countries, the subsidization for education is relatively low.
The main reason why I support the idea that providing children under 18 years of age with a full-time study course is a requirement is that such practice can reduce the amount of juvenile delinquency. When entering a full-time study course, teenagers can access a lot of moral lessons and official laws as well as consequences if they disobey. As a result, they can gradually bear in their minds about which practices are eligible and which are illicit. To illustrate, reading the book called “Civic education” is likely to effectively educate children about many affairs relating to morality such as always being grateful to guardians or polite to the older; moreover, they can be taught about a wide range of laws in order to prevent them from breaking the rules. Another reason for my support is that with high educated teenagers, a country can get significant economic returns and societies can achieve lasting peace and sustainable development. Since teenagers receive full-time education, they are probably becoming exemplary citizens; ergo, they willingly dedicate themselves to their nation. Therefore, societies can live in peace with continual growth.
However, this practice may not be possible for some poor residents as they are unable to pay tuition fees. Such underprivileged families have to earn money to make ends meet so even though they want to let their children access full-time study, they simply cannot have sufficient financial support. To illustrate, a study conducted by The Guardians reveals that more than ten percent of worldwide children haven’t come to school due to destitution. Moreover, in many third-world countries, the subsidization for academic experience is still low. To epitomize, governments in Yemen spend most of the budget on buying weapons to combat extremists; ergo, they cannot allocate sufficient money for school-aged children to broaden their horizons.
In conclusion, I partly agree that children under 18 years old should be provided with full-time education because this can reduce the number of lawbreakers that are in teen ages and make countries more prestigious. However, I admit that this practice may be impossible in some third-world nations as well as underprivileged families.
- Some people think that all teenagers should be required to do unpaid work in their free time to help the local community They believe this would benefit both the individual teenager and society as a whole Do you agree or disagree 56
- The maps below show how the town of Harborne changes from 1936 to 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The following maps show some of the changes that have taken place in Dubai in recent decades Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and making comparisons while relevant 78
- Rich countries often give money to poorer countries but it does not solve poverty Therefore developed countries should give other types of help to poor countries rather than financial aid To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Newspapers are less important nowadays because we have up to date access to the news on the internet To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, may, moreover, so, still, therefore, third, well, in conclusion, such as, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 7.85571142285 216% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2316.0 1615.20841683 143% => OK
No of words: 427.0 315.596192385 135% => OK
Chars per words: 5.42388758782 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.54576487731 4.20363070211 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93605091922 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 230.0 176.041082164 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.538641686183 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 728.1 506.74238477 144% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 75.6608128013 49.4020404114 153% => OK
Chars per sentence: 144.75 106.682146367 136% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.6875 20.7667163134 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.875 7.06120827912 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.231655106141 0.244688304435 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0806616937748 0.084324248473 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0907566157908 0.0667982634062 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.17745671595 0.151304729494 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0851317735069 0.056905535591 150% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 13.0946893788 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 50.2224549098 73% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.4 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 121.0 78.4519038076 154% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 20.0 9.78957915832 204% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.