Homelessness is increasing in many major cities around the world.
What do you think are the main causes of this problem and what measures could be taken to solve it?
Homeless people ubiquitous over the world. The less job vacancy and the expensive price of house are the main problem. However, the government policy to build new factories and transmigration to remote places are the best solution to handle this problem.
Job vacancy is the common matter in every nation. Because, almost all people have a tendency to work in office instead of to be an entrepreneur, while the capacity of office usually only could receive a few people. Putting more simply, the situation produce competition to be selected as one of officer. However, it could be resolved by the policy of authority to open a new factory in several cities.
In addition, house price seems increase every year. This phenomenon creates a huge problem for society. Because, just few people have a capability to buy or rent a house. For example, in Yogyakarta, a wonderful city in Indonesia, the average salary for workers in Yogyakarta is only 2 million rupiah, while the price for small house in Yogyakarta is approximately 400 million rupiah. So, the common workers could buy a small house if they work (without eat, shopping, and travelling) for almost 20 years. However, this matter could be tackled by the transmigration policy. The policy is to move people from urban area to remote areas, and they can start a new life.
In conclusion, vagabond as the common problem in every country caused by the sum of job and the expenses to buy or rent a house. However, it could be tackled by the policy to create a new factory and move people to some sub-urban places. Where possible, the government should enact the bill to force the private sector to build new manufactory in every city and migrate all homeless people in remote areas to be a farmer.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-06 | iamNgan | view | |
| 2022-07-14 | isobekass | 56 | view |
| 2022-07-14 | dinora rajabboyeva | 56 | view |
| 2022-07-14 | dinora rajabboyeva | 56 | view |
| 2022-07-14 | dinora rajabboyeva | 56 | view |
- Homelessness is increasing in many major cities around the world What do you think are the main causes of this problem and what measures could be taken to solve it 56
- Many countries are experiencing serious problems with their environment with pollution of their land water and air What are these problems and how might they be reduced 78
- Some people believe that social media sites such as Facebook or Twitter have a negative impact on young people and their ability to form personal relationships Others believe that these sites bring people together in a beneficial way 87
- Some people regard eating meat as completely wrong To what extent do you agree 57
- The chart below shows the proportion of businesses making e commerce purchases by industry in Canada between 2015 and 2019 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 100
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, while, as to, for example, in addition, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 7.30460921844 14% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 7.0 24.0651302605 29% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1456.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 301.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 4.83720930233 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16525528304 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65378433073 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.491694352159 0.561755894193 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 482.4 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 48.3493629705 49.4020404114 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.6470588235 106.682146367 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7058823529 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.11764705882 7.06120827912 58% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.1465479867 0.244688304435 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0525610992445 0.084324248473 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0363175170484 0.0667982634062 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0993205347801 0.151304729494 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0239452515666 0.056905535591 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 13.0946893788 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.5 12.4159519038 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.1 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, while, as to, for example, in addition, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 7.30460921844 14% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 7.0 24.0651302605 29% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1456.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 301.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 4.83720930233 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16525528304 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65378433073 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.491694352159 0.561755894193 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 482.4 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 48.3493629705 49.4020404114 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.6470588235 106.682146367 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7058823529 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.11764705882 7.06120827912 58% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.1465479867 0.244688304435 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0525610992445 0.084324248473 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0363175170484 0.0667982634062 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0993205347801 0.151304729494 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0239452515666 0.056905535591 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 13.0946893788 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.5 12.4159519038 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.1 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.