Government should invest on teaching science subjects rather than other subject for country develop and progress . To what extend do you agree or not agree.
Many people complain that the government should spend more attention on coaching science subjects than other course to make country to gain ground.
And personally, I don’t fully agree with this debate and this essay will outline my view below.
First of all, it is easy to see that most works which has well paid required knowledge or skills relating to sciences. So when the government invest more on science subjects re-similar as math, physics, chemistry, …, we can create high-qualified students in the future. And they can achieve their goals, not only benefits to the individuals but also for the nation. Another benefits that modern science has granted, it is a development of renewable energy. Source of renewable energy such as wind generate power to reduce carbon emission on our planet.
On the other hand, we must admit that other subjects such as literature, history, geography, … are also important to our long culture. They reminded us about our nation history and stories. And a nation should not only have one side like science. For now in a globalized world, our culture is collaborating the world culture and continuing to lose our traditional values. Therefore, when we go on preserving and respecting other subjects like art and history that make sure young generations would always remember the ethnic tradition of our ancestor.
So in conclusion, when we are developing our nation, science is not the only thing that we should invest most on for our culture is like our appearance to us and the world.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-04-06 | Nguyen Manh Dung | 61 | view |
| 2020-02-10 | longpm2k | 73 | view |
- The maps below show the changes in a town after the construction of a hydroelectric power dam 78
- The graph below shows the number of overseas visitors to three different areas in a European country between 1987 and 2007. 78
- The society would benefit from a ban on all forms of advertising because it serves no useful purpose and can even be damaging To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- It is neither possible nor useful for a country to provide university places for a high proportion of young people 84
- The given maps show two di erent underground passage frameworks for autos in two Australian refers to 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, so, therefore, well, in conclusion, such as, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1292.0 1615.20841683 80% => OK
No of words: 256.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.046875 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66029104376 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.6015625 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 395.1 506.74238477 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.419977545 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.3846153846 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6923076923 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.53846153846 7.06120827912 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.214935355082 0.244688304435 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0687028444896 0.084324248473 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0660373949261 0.0667982634062 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122530226295 0.151304729494 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0635117241749 0.056905535591 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.28 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 78.4519038076 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.