More and more wild animals are on the verge of extinction and others at on the endangered list. What are the reasons for this? What can be done to solve this problem?
In recent years, deforestation becoming the reason why the wild animals’ life is reaching closer to the phase of extinction while some others are put at risk. However, building a bioserve could be the solution to this issue.
Demolishment of forests in many nations has put wildlife at risk of extinction, leading to an ecosystem imbalance in animals' life. To put it more simply, deforestation jeopardizes the natural habitats of particular animals, forcing them to adapt to different circumstances that are not fit with their instinct. For instance, data showed around 10% of Orang Utan in Kalimantan died in 2010 because of the massive forest logging in 2009. The logging led to the loss of 800 Ha trees, a home for 7000 Orang Utan, which forced them to leave and die due to food deficiency. Thus, more wildlife is at risk due to deforestation.
The most decent approach to solve the issue is to build a wildlife reservation that will monitor the lives of the endangered animals. This is because bioserve areas are strictly regulated and would prevent acts that would be harmful to the wildlife. As proven by Taman Marga Satwa Ujung Kulon, a house for the last 50 one-horned rhinos alive, they have caught more than 1100 illegal loggers from cutting the trees in the last past decade. This is supported by their advanced 24/7 protection system that would strictly monitor every track to the forest, preventing people from getting inside.
To conclude, wildlife conservation is seemingly the best solution to tackle deforestation that is harmful to the life of wild animals. This can be started by the program provided by the government.
- Average Household Expenditure in 2019 and 2020
- Nowadays many people have access to computers on a wide basis and a large number of children play computer games What are the negative impacts of playing computer games and what can be done to minimize the bad effect 61
- The demand for food is increasing worldwide Why has it happened What measures could the international community take to improve the situation 78
- Time Spent Per Activity of People in Several Countries From 1998 to 2009 85
- The line chart conveys the proportion of viewers watching Channer one news several times counted in millions 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, thus, while, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 10.4138276553 19% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1375.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 275.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73926092463 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.614545454545 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 423.9 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.1787846796 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.769230769 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1538461538 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.23076923077 7.06120827912 46% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.233550237621 0.244688304435 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0764677852222 0.084324248473 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0485050193899 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136384659825 0.151304729494 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0408639769934 0.056905535591 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.72 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.27 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.