Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the above statement?
What other measures do you think might be effective?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
You should write at least 250 words.
In recent times, car and motorbike ownerships have significantly increased, which has negatively resulted in congestion and severe contamination in the whole world. Hence, some recommend that the rise in petrol price would be the best way for this alarming issue. The advocates with this perspective and other personal plausible methods will be outlined in the following essay.
To begin with, the two visible arguments are the obstacle to petrol-exported nations and the global negative influence on numerous goods. First of all, several wealthy countries earn a good living mostly on petroleum and oil trading internationally, which contributes considerably to their GDP values. As a result, if the growth of the price is required, which means residents tend to avoid equipment and vehicles using fuels, those affluent states have to make a transformation in economics. Shifting to the latter viewpoint, on account of the increase in the cost of transportation, various commodities in the market will indirectly raise the cost. Therefore, not only pedestrians, but also the whole citizens have to cope with the escalating price.
The most effective approach that the governments can consider is encouraging private enterprises to install underground rail tracks for electronic trams. People undoubtedly have no motivation to utilize public transport due to the incoherent schedules and the lack of transport. As a consequence, investing in those areas may help a lot in tackling traffic and pollution problems.
To summarize, the advantages of the higher cost of gasoline may not outweigh its disadvantages. consequently, instead, motivating inhabitants to travel by public transport is perhaps a more practicable measure.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-04-13 | monmon12345 | 89 | view |
| 2021-07-25 | tanmeet | 56 | view |
| 2020-09-17 | Maryam42 | 84 | view |
| 2020-09-17 | rini pratiwi | 56 | view |
| 2020-09-17 | rini pratiwi | 56 | view |
- In the past when students did a university degree they tended to study in their own country Nowadays they have more opportunities to study abroad What are the advantages and disadvantages of this development 73
- In some countries an increasing number of people are suffering from health problems as a result of eating too much fast food It is therefore necessary for governments to impose a higher tax on this kind of food 89
- Creative artists should always be given the freedom to express their own ideas in words pictures music film in whichever way they wish There should be no public or government restrictions on what they do To what extent do you agree or disagree with this s 78
- The maps below show the village of Stokeford in 1930 and 2010 89
- The pie charts below show the online shopping sales for retail sectors in new Zealand in 2003 and 2013 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting main features and make comparisons where relevant
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 97, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Consequently
...ine may not outweigh its disadvantages. consequently, instead, motivating inhabitants to tra...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, hence, if, may, so, therefore, as a result, first of all, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 8.0 24.0651302605 33% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1477.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 263.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.61596958175 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.24134172422 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.680608365019 0.561755894193 121% => OK
syllable_count: 455.4 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.9938849784 49.4020404114 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.615384615 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2307692308 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.92307692308 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.106460359775 0.244688304435 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0341913670178 0.084324248473 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0405449281531 0.0667982634062 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0551713674254 0.151304729494 36% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0411544415832 0.056905535591 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.32 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.51 8.58950901804 122% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.