The picture below illustrates the general design of a medical centre in 2008 and 2010.
Overall, the total space was widened with some certain rooms had been added in order to serve the needs of patients and doctors.
As can be seen in the 2008 plan, the centre was installed with must-have rooms. The waiting room was explicitly the biggest one then to the treatment room. The doctor’s office was constructed on one side of the centre with three rooms to be seen. Apart from these, there was a staff office along with reception and the last room which was connected with the waiting room, the laboratory
Two years later, there were some significant changes to be noticed. The first to mention is the number of rooms. From eight in total, the center had extended to thirteen rooms with more functions available. There were an education room and mother and child room next to the waiting room. One doctor’s office was added and on the same side, a storeroom appeared at the end of the corridor. The next is the pharmacy next to the laboratory.
- An increase in the production of consumer goods results in damage of our natural environment What are the causes and solutions 84
- Although there is a lot of translation software available learning a language still could be advantageous To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- Topic Some people claim that tourism can help to bridge cultural gaps between people of different nationalities and cultures Do you agree or disagree 73
- The crime rate nowadays is decreasing compared to the past due to advanced technology which can prevent and solve a crime Do you agree or disagree 84
- Around the world it is likely that more adults will work from home and more children will study from home as computer technology becomes cheaper and more accessible Do you think it is a negative or a positive development 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, so, then, apart from
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 7.0 214% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 866.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 185.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.68108108108 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68801715136 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.34827384812 2.65546596893 88% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.540540540541 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 261.0 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 10.0 4.33902439024 230% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.3007727104 43.030603864 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 78.7272727273 112.824112599 70% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8181818182 22.9334400587 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.81818181818 5.23603664747 54% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0637569162804 0.215688989381 30% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0365642431861 0.103423049105 35% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0756806267802 0.0843802449381 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0745980704787 0.15604864568 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.1038252556 0.0819641961636 127% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.0 13.2329268293 68% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.57 11.4140731707 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.5 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.