The plan below shows a city in 1950 and the city now
The two pictures compare the layouts of a city in two periods, namely 1950 and the present time. It is clear that there are changes in the layout of this city over the period shown. The main modifications have included the expansion of residential area and the addition of many modern infrastructures.
Looking at the changes in more detail, we can see that in 1950 there was a residential area on the north side of a river running from the west to the east. Now, however, this residential area has been expanded to the other side of the river. In addition, the business district in the middle of the residential area has been erected.
At the present time, the lake with a dam has been built in the center of the map. Furthermore, The airport has been moved toward the east. Finally, The road and the government building in the north side have been constructed
- The charts below show the percentage of time spent by working adults on different activities in a particular country in 1958 and 2008 67
- More and more people work at home and study at home with the development of computer technology Do you think it is a positive or negative development 56
- The charts below show changes in the proportion of the energy produced from different resources in a country in 1985 and 2003 73
- Some people think the increasing use of technology in the workplace is good for young people s prospects of gaining jobs and harder for old people To what extent do you agree or disagree 49
- Some people say that people should have a different amount of holidays according to their job To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, furthermore, however, if, look, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 709.0 965.302439024 73% => OK
No of words: 155.0 196.424390244 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.57419354839 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.52844152537 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61557012446 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 83.0 106.607317073 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.535483870968 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 219.6 283.868780488 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.3274723904 43.030603864 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 78.7777777778 112.824112599 70% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.2222222222 22.9334400587 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.77777777778 5.23603664747 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.11277092234 0.215688989381 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0452819854297 0.103423049105 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0625239131927 0.0843802449381 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0732379407329 0.15604864568 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0719570067568 0.0819641961636 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.7 13.2329268293 66% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 61.2550243902 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.93 11.4140731707 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.03 8.06136585366 87% => OK
difficult_words: 25.0 40.7170731707 61% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.