The pie graphs show the nutritional consistency of the two dinners.
The given pie graphs provide a comparison of the nutritional component of baked potato and macaroni provided in one meal.
From an overall perspective, it is evident that carbohydrates account for a major portion of both dinners whereas the reverse pattern should be observed for saturated fat and other nutrients.
According to the recorded data, it is conspicuous that the number of carbohydrates in a medium baked potato accounts for more than one-third while this number in macaroni is more than a half. Subsequently, the protein element in a grilled potato occupies exactly one-fourth and is roughly higher than 2 times when compared with macaroni.
Turning to the three remaining groups, the proportion of glucose in both dinners nearly has the same pattern, with the number being 15 percent in a baked potato and 11% in macaroni. However, it is obvious that the divergence of the share of protein and glucose in macaroni is nothing, while the protein in grilled potato was more than 10 percent when compared with glucose. Finally, the saturated fat in baked potato was less than 2 times of macaroni and other nutrients host more percentage in baked potato than in macaroni.
- Large companies use sport events to promote their products Some people think this has a negative impact on sports To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- The charts below show the Internet use for different purposes in Australia in 2010 2011 and the percentage by users 73
- Some people think that government is responsible for the rise in obesity in children Do you agree or disagree Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience 73
- It is suggested that primary children should learn how to grow vegetables and keep animals Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 78
- The diagram below shows the manufacturing process for making sugar from sugar cane 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, however, so, third, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 994.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 196.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07142857143 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74165738677 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74231727559 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.505102040816 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 318.6 283.868780488 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 26.1299734061 43.030603864 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.0 112.824112599 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.0 22.9334400587 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.14285714286 5.23603664747 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0609216809135 0.215688989381 28% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0372656387052 0.103423049105 36% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.059548173476 0.0843802449381 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0587659154048 0.15604864568 38% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0690584702889 0.0819641961636 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.2329268293 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.06 61.2550243902 70% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.3012195122 138% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.21 8.06136585366 114% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.