While people in developing countries are happier than in the past, people in developed countries are less happy. Why? What can be learnt from this?
In recent years, it has become more common for people living in developing nations to be happier while those living in developed countries are not often in this state. There are various reasons for this, and this current situation also comes along with many valuable lessons to learn from.
Since happiness is people's own emotion and it comes from random, little things such as going out with their best friends or watching a movie on Netflix on Saturday night. Residents who live in developing regions will likely have more free time to enjoy quality time with family and friends, hence, not only keeping them in a peaceful state of mind but also developing nice and close relationships surrounding them all the time. And then when they feel sad or lonely, they can reach out to their loved ones, and share their stories and thoughts, therefore, become relaxed and happier. Furthermore, individuals living in developed nations may not have this luck with the booming of different kinds of industries along with the fast-paced lifestyle. Because citizens including adults and children are likely to put all their time and efforts focusing on their future goals and success rather than their own emotions. Due to the lack of connection between each individual, society will become more and more emotionally distant while gradually forming a generation gap. For instance, 78% of teenagers who live in Los Angeles care more about their appearances, what clothes they are wearing, and how many likes they are getting from all the social media platforms than a cozy dinner or having a conversation with their families, according to the BBC News.
Although, individuals and governments can learn from this in order to turn their society into a happier place with joy and laughs everywhere and every time. Firstly, local authorities should promote fun activities to reconnect people into a community along with broadcasting several yet interesting comedy shows on TV instead of dramas and gossip news. Secondly, companies should cut down working hours and increase the number of days off, holidays and same to school. Therefore, families and friends can have time to gather and get to know each others' feelings instead of the economy's growth or some celebrities' insights. All these implementations will potentially boost residents' happy state up to a higher rate. If they have a clear headspace to keep studying and working hard, the education system, economy, and all kinds of fields will also benefit from this result.
In conclusion, for the reasons I have mentioned above, I strongly believed that each individual has caused this without their knowledge. However, it can be improved by encouraging people to be more engaged in community campaigns with actions needed from the government as well as the local authorities.
- The diagram shows production of sugar by a german company for supermarkets and restaurants 100
- People believe that individuals who make a lot of money are the most successful Others say that those who contribute to society like scientists teachers are the most successful Discuss both and give your opinion 93
- The diagrams give information about changes in a student accommodation 78
- Some people think that mobile phones should be banned in public places like libraries shops and on public transport To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 61
- The pictures below show the process of making clothes from recycled plastic bottles Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, hence, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, well, while, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 29.0 10.4138276553 278% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 67.0 41.998997996 160% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2365.0 1615.20841683 146% => OK
No of words: 460.0 315.596192385 146% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14130434783 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.6311565067 4.20363070211 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6236482702 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 268.0 176.041082164 152% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.582608695652 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 727.2 506.74238477 144% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 0.809619238477 618% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 45.2198015235 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.117647059 106.682146367 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.0588235294 20.7667163134 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.70588235294 7.06120827912 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 8.67935871743 184% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.229683273363 0.244688304435 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0711835820861 0.084324248473 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0757596450405 0.0667982634062 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.164870458985 0.151304729494 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0790171116494 0.056905535591 139% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 50.2224549098 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.99 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 117.0 78.4519038076 149% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, hence, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, well, while, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 29.0 10.4138276553 278% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 67.0 41.998997996 160% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2365.0 1615.20841683 146% => OK
No of words: 460.0 315.596192385 146% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14130434783 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.6311565067 4.20363070211 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6236482702 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 268.0 176.041082164 152% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.582608695652 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 727.2 506.74238477 144% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 0.809619238477 618% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 45.2198015235 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.117647059 106.682146367 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.0588235294 20.7667163134 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.70588235294 7.06120827912 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 8.67935871743 184% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.229683273363 0.244688304435 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0711835820861 0.084324248473 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0757596450405 0.0667982634062 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.164870458985 0.151304729494 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0790171116494 0.056905535591 139% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 50.2224549098 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.99 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 117.0 78.4519038076 149% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.