An increase in the production of consumer goods results in damage to the natural environment Why is this the case and what solutions are possible

Essay topics:

An increase in the production of consumer goods results in damage to the natural environment. Why is this the case, and what solutions are possible?

It is true that the more goods are being produced and consumed, the more damaging to the environment it is. This essay will discuss the prime reasons for this problem, and possible solutions will be mentioned.

There are various reasons why the natural environment is negatively affected by human actions. Firstly, a rise in good production means more things for people to buy and consume, and they, therefore, need more plastic or non-recycled holders. These bags can last for thousands of years and destroy the natural habitats on Earth. Secondly, during daily activities, factories release carbon dioxide and chemical waste. Carbon dioxide causes air pollution, leading to global warming and climate changes, and toxic waste can pollute water sources and kills the wildlife that depends on clean water.

Several measures can be taken to help address these issues. Regarding air and water pollution, governments may introduce a ‘Green economy’ policy that forces companies and factories to follow. The high penalties and strict punishment for companies which go against the policy may force managers to find alternative production methods that are more environmentally friendly. Governments could also promote campaigns that encourage people to use recycled bags, and supermarkets could help the campaigns by charging plastic bags at higher prices or replacing all those bags with bio-degradable ones. Individuals may do their own part in protecting the environment by stopping using environmentally unfriendly materials irresponsibly.

In conclusion, production in factories and consumption worldwide is the leading causes of environmental destruction, which can be stopped with joint actions from governments, companies, and individuals.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-03-26 Anh Thi 84 view
2022-06-15 artbui221 84 view
2022-06-14 artbui221 78 view
2022-06-14 artbui221 78 view
Essays by user artbui221 :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, if, may, regarding, second, secondly, so, therefore, in conclusion, in fact, it is true

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 41.998997996 60% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1495.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 260.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.75 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01929446283 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.638461538462 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 448.2 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 5.0 0.809619238477 618% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.1575324222 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.0 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.38461538462 7.06120827912 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.136778639047 0.244688304435 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0475269978359 0.084324248473 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0541906235786 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0865895682626 0.151304729494 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0682559491147 0.056905535591 120% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.0946893788 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.07 12.4159519038 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.09 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.