It is important for children to learn the difference between right and wrong at an early age. Punishment is necessary to help them learn this distinction. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
There has been a colossal upsurge in discussing the vital role of helping students distinguish right and wrong at the initial age and the benefits of punishment in learning this distinction. While this phenomenon can bring advantageous meaning to children's development, there still exists a range of drawbacks to them. Despite, the debatable assumption, I personally agree with this statement and will give my rational points about this issue in the following paragraph.
First and foremost, it is evident that the cognition of toddlers influences a range of facets in their maturity. Parents should drive their offspring about right and wrong in any circumstances in order to help them can access more case studies at the initial age. Secondly, these lessons create a chance for children to practice their behavior in the right way. They may enjoy a free right of thought and speak and establish their own view in any situation. Thirdly, punishment does not always bring negative effects on their mind. 'Spare the rod, spoil the child' is a method that sometimes can teach children about the mean value of our life. Taking, for instance, toddlers may own an objective opinion on some social phenomena and are not totally dependent on their parents' views.
To be clear, recognizing the distinction between right and wrong, black and white, etc can shape children's personalities. Offspring may become more self-reliant and no longer be pampered by their parents. Moreover, a penalty for toddlers draws a clear picture for students about their misbehaving or the wrong things they do. This can ensure that children do not repeat an offense and avoid behaving that in any conditions. However, punishment does not always the right method for educating children. Adults or parents can help the children recognize their mistakes by punishing by verbal or any methods recommended by experts in educating children. Some horrendous punishment can be seen as abusive or physical violence which is counter-interactive and bring harmful effect on children's development. Perhaps the best examples of this would be the student's strict rules which play a role in teaching children in Asia. These regulations can lead children to become more rebellious and create a gap among generations under one roof. The pressure from these rules can lead children to suicide and become depressed.
In conclusion, teaching children in distinguishing right and wrong in our daily life can bring many advantageous meanings to their development. Punishment does not always use in every circumstance, especially in special cases. I wholeheartedly believe in the statement that children need to be taught to recognize the distinction between right and wrong at the initial age.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-04-25 | trpg143 | 78 | view |
| 2024-01-03 | Ahmad_off | 67 | view |
| 2023-12-17 | minhnhat230602 | 84 | view |
| 2023-11-16 | phamquanghmu | 67 | view |
| 2023-09-05 | Nowshin Tabassum | 78 | view |
- The graphs below show the enrolments of overseas students and local students in Australian universities over a ten year period 67
- To succeed in a business one needs to know maths To what extent do you agree or disagree 11
- The diagram shows the components of a neuron and how it works 93
- Some people think that government is responsible for the rise in obesity in children Do you agree or disagree Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience 73
- The diagram shows how chocolate is produced 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, still, third, thirdly, while, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 7.85571142285 216% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 21.0 10.4138276553 202% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 24.0651302605 141% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 57.0 41.998997996 136% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.3376753507 228% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2307.0 1615.20841683 143% => OK
No of words: 438.0 315.596192385 139% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.26712328767 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57476223824 4.20363070211 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91307470784 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 228.0 176.041082164 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.520547945205 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 693.0 506.74238477 137% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 16.0721442886 143% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.8545940584 49.4020404114 60% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.304347826 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0434782609 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.95652173913 7.06120827912 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 14.0 3.9879759519 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.291533079377 0.244688304435 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0851370606367 0.084324248473 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0642076622964 0.0667982634062 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.195755560377 0.151304729494 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.06367009513 0.056905535591 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.69 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 114.0 78.4519038076 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.