The charts show the sources of the electricity produced in 4 countries between 2003 and 2008. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The given pie charts compare the orgins of electicity in 4 different counries in the year 2003 and 2008.
It is clear that fossil fuel was the highest figure in Vietnam and Indian whilst hydro power was the highest proportion of the electric sources in Morocco and Sweden. However, nuclear power did not appear in Vietnam and Morocco.
In Vietnam, fossil fuel was used mostly and hydro power was not so common as fossil fuel accounted for 56% and 44% respectively. However, in Morocco, fossil fuel was not the most popular, the most popular percentage was that hydro power with 95%, followed by fossil fuel at 5%. In Indian, fossil fuel was the highest figues comprised 82%, followed by hydro power with 14% and nuclear was the lowest proportion with 4%.
In Sweden, it was the same as Morocco, the percentage of hydro power was the highest with 52%. The figure of nuclear power was higher than the proportion of hydro power at 44% and 2% respectively and hydro power was the lowest percentage in this country.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-09-19 | nobitaa | 73 | view |
| 2024-09-19 | nobitaa | view | |
| 2024-03-28 | minhnhat2002 | 73 | view |
| 2023-10-29 | nguyenanh9182 | 78 | view |
| 2023-10-29 | nguyenanh9182 | 78 | view |
- The charts show the sources of the electricity produced in 4 countries in 2003 and 2008 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- Some people could be naturally good leaders Others believe that people can learn leadership skills Discuss both views and give your opinion 84
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010 60
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010
- The chart below shows the expenditure of two contries on consumer goods in 2010 pounds sterlng 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 837.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 177.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.72881355932 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64748333727 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.35245445056 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 79.0 106.607317073 74% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.446327683616 0.547539520022 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 247.5 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.7231374578 43.030603864 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.625 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.125 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.875 5.23603664747 36% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0276069613126 0.215688989381 13% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0212065183018 0.103423049105 21% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0402222314922 0.0843802449381 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0396286528041 0.15604864568 25% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0480192985003 0.0819641961636 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.2329268293 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.15 11.4140731707 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.49 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.