The unlimited use of cars may cause many problems. What are those problems? In order to reduce the problems, should we discourage people from using cars?
With the advancement in the transportation field, cars have been used on a larger scale than before. It offers flexibility and provides ready access to many work and leisure options. However, recently, a range of issues associating with the uncontrolled increase in the use of cars have surfaced and need to be addressed. In this essay, I plan to identify those complicated problems and propose some feasible solutions to them.
Firstly, cities' catastrophic air quality can be attributed to the widespread use of cars. Exhaust gas emitted by car engines discharge a plethora of poisonous gases including carbon dioxide, hydrogen sulfide, and carbon monoxide, which are leading contributors to air pollution and detrimentally affect people's health by causing respiratory diseases and even lung cancer.
Another adverse aspect of the immense use of automobiles is traffic congestion. City-dwellers these days have gotten so used to being stuck in seemingly inescapable traffic jams. It is claimed that people often spend two to three hours solely for commuting to work and getting home, which might seriously damage employees’ work productivity as instead of resting, they are forced to spend an extensive amount of time on the road everyday.
To alleviate these problems, a section of society suggests the government impose a strict restriction on the aforementioned vehicle. However, from my point of view, this is not a suitable solution. Firstly, discouraging citizens from driving can result in a decline in the car manufacturing industry, which is one of the most important industries in numerous countries. Moreover, cars' mobility can be significantly helpful to people's lives. To solve this dilemma, the government should encourage car manufacturers to produce more environmentally-friendly and affordable car designs. Furthermore, ameliorations of the public transport system need to be made immediately in order to attract more residents into using it instead of driving.
To sum up, though automobiles have undoubtedly played a crucial role in people's lives ever since they were invented, the uncontrolled use of them can be damaging to society by degrading air quality and causing traffic congestion. In order to tackle those issues, discouraging people from using cars is definitely not a permanent cure. Instead, I recommend we invest more in cars that run on solar or electrical energy and improve the public transport system.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-07-19 | qaengx12 | 89 | view |
| 2021-08-19 | claraa_ltn | 84 | view |
- In recent years the family structure has changed as well as family roles Do you think these changes are positive or negative 84
- Several languages are in danger of extinction because they are spoken by very small numbers of people Some people say that governments should spend public money on saving these languages while others believe that would be a waste of money Discuss both vie 73
- Some people think students should study the science of food and how to prepare it Others think students should spend more time on more important subjects Discuss both views and give your own opinion 49
- Families who send their children to private schools should not berequired to pay taxes that support the state education system 61
- In recent years the family structure has changed as well as family roles What types of changes are occurring Do you think these changes are positive or negative 89
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 430, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
...an extensive amount of time on the road everyday. To alleviate these problems, a sect...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, well, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 41.998997996 143% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2075.0 1615.20841683 128% => OK
No of words: 379.0 315.596192385 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.47493403694 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41224685777 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.20990974679 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 231.0 176.041082164 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.609498680739 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 664.2 506.74238477 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.2568356106 49.4020404114 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.277777778 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0555555556 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.22222222222 7.06120827912 60% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 3.9879759519 276% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.311459662549 0.244688304435 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0862178832979 0.084324248473 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0669812870052 0.0667982634062 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153530582201 0.151304729494 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.065984423269 0.056905535591 116% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 50.2224549098 66% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.26 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 134.0 78.4519038076 171% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 430, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
...an extensive amount of time on the road everyday. To alleviate these problems, a sect...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, well, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 41.998997996 143% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2075.0 1615.20841683 128% => OK
No of words: 379.0 315.596192385 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.47493403694 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41224685777 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.20990974679 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 231.0 176.041082164 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.609498680739 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 664.2 506.74238477 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.2568356106 49.4020404114 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.277777778 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0555555556 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.22222222222 7.06120827912 60% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 3.9879759519 276% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.311459662549 0.244688304435 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0862178832979 0.084324248473 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0669812870052 0.0667982634062 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153530582201 0.151304729494 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.065984423269 0.056905535591 116% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 50.2224549098 66% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.26 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 134.0 78.4519038076 171% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.