The plans show the change of a small theater in 2010 and 2012.
The given maps illustrate the development of a petty theatre from 2010 to 2012.
It is clear that there are two main sections, ones for performences and ones for customer sevices. Two of the most significant changes are the expansion of the theatre and the addition of some facilities.
In 2010, in the customer services area, there was a Cafe' on the left of the entrance, on the opposite side, there were the admin office and the ticket office. Go deep inside, there were a row of chairs for watchers to watch the film was shown at Stage opposite the row of seats. Behind of the stage was the media. There was a storageon the left of this area
In 2012, the customer services area was expanded, the Cafe' was replaced by ticket office and there was a restaurant on the left of the entrance, opposite the restaurant was the admin office. In the performance area, the media was replaced by a hall, this was moved to the left of the area, there was a small showers room in here. The storage was moved to the right of this area.
- Some people claim that museums and art galleries are not needed today because everyone can see historical objects or art works by computer To what extent do you agree or disagree write introduction
- The table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features make comparion where relevant 73
- The line graph shows the percentage of New Zealand population from 1950 and 2050 78
- Topic The graph below gives information about U S government spending on research between 1980 and 2008 65
- The plans show the change of a small theater in 2010 and 2012 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 7.0 243% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 838.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 190.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.41052631579 4.92477711251 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71268753763 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.37388842627 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 84.0 106.607317073 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.442105263158 0.547539520022 81% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 270.0 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.2324694169 43.030603864 133% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.1111111111 112.824112599 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1111111111 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.666666666667 5.23603664747 13% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0729449580155 0.215688989381 34% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0372106889381 0.103423049105 36% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.045484335876 0.0843802449381 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0619334327956 0.15604864568 40% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0487953561634 0.0819641961636 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 13.2329268293 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.3 11.4140731707 73% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.42 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.