Education for young people is important in many countris. However, the others think government should spend more money for education in adult population who cannot read and write. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Training for children plays an extremely vital role in many countries. Nevertheless, the others think the authority should invest more money in education in older people who cannot read and write. I utterly concur with this statement. While youth generation is the bright future of their own country, I am strongly convinced that spending a lot of money helps to boost the economy of the nation.
To begin with, it has been widely demonstrated that education for children is of necessity, without exaggeration that they are the future pillars of the country. In reality, it is undoubted that teaching for young people should be prioritized firstly. In addition, the elderly pass on valuable knowledge to them, who can detect a new insight. As a result, youngsters play an extraordinarily crucial role in a lot of countries. A good example of this is Viet Nam, the government invests a great deal of money in building schools, creating the best environment to ameliorate the quality of children’s education.
On the other hand, it is obvious that illiteracy that the authority have to radically cope with owing to its influence in the development of the nation’s economy. In the fact that an empirical study published in a newspaper in Viet Nam and economists said that the development of the nation is directly proportional to average incomes. Hence, illiteracy needs to address as soon as possible, resulting in climbing the career ladder of illiteracy inhabitants. As a consequence, this help to boost the national economy. This can be evidenced by America, being the most wealthy in the world. According to empirical research revealed that all people can read and write.
In conclusion, I completely advocate that idea. Whereas education for young people is of importance because of being the future of the country, illiteracy should spend much money to tackle radically, developing the national economy.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-07-28 | doquytuan | 73 | view |
| 2019-08-27 | Evelyn_Han | 84 | view |
| 2019-08-15 | fachryadul92 | 73 | view |
| 2019-08-08 | IVANTRUONG | 78 | view |
| 2019-08-08 | IVANTRUONG | 67 | view |
- It is a natural process for animal species to become extinct e g Dinosaur dodos There is no reason why people should try to prevent this from happening Do you agree or disagree 56
- Some people think the government funding should not be used for supporting art and culture while others think supporting cultural activities may be beneficial for the population and the culture Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 73
- In many places people s lifestyle is changing rapidly and this affects family relationship Do you think the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages 78
- Studies suggest that many teenagers these days prefer socialising online to meeting one another in person Why do you think this is the case 67
- Traffic and housing problems in major cities could be solved by moving large companies and factories and their employees to the countryside To what extend do you agree or disagree with this opinion 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 154, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ng the future of the country, illiteracy should spend much money to tackle radica...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, hence, nevertheless, so, whereas, while, in addition, in conclusion, as a result, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1606.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 311.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16398713826 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19942759058 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96770108304 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.556270096463 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 508.5 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.2460105001 49.4020404114 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.4705882353 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2941176471 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.64705882353 7.06120827912 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.252427835962 0.244688304435 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0719489874414 0.084324248473 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103245943395 0.0667982634062 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.171925907249 0.151304729494 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0892165264507 0.056905535591 157% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.0 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.