In the past, people stored knowledge in books. Nowadays people store knowledge on the internet. Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?
A person who was born and raised in social life in the distant past would have entirely different experiences as the person growing up in the technological life due to in the past, we used to learn knowledge traditionally from book but nowadays people tend to reach the knowledge via the Internet. In my perpestive, online education has more denefits than drawbacks in some cases
On the one hand, there were some disadvantages to storing the knowledge the Internet. To begin with, the majority of people could not enough attention despite of a large number of entertainment such as online game or social media. Furthermore, they can not reach the knowledge effectively. Secondly, their devices need to connect with the Internet. As the result, when the electricity does not work which mean our devices are out of work definately and we can not learn anymore.
On the other hand, there were some advantages to learning from Internet. First of all, the can protect the environment due to the Internet does not need paper, furthermore we can reduce a large number of wood and our forest will be reserved. Finally, the Internet education is comfortable for people who have less time to look up book in the bookstore. For example, we can learn everytime and everywhere, evenmore when we are at school or at work due to our devices are portable and easily connect with the Internet.
Inconclusion, based on the advantages and disadvantages discussed above, I am convinced that the benefits outweigh the drawbacks. Reading book is a traditional ways of learning which is more suitable for the past while learning from the Internet is more greatest and the most common forms of method for people in modern life
- The graph below compares the changes in the birth rates of China and the USA between 1920 and 2000. 56
- The graph below compares the changes in the birth rates of China and the USA between 1920 and 2000 78
- The graph below compares the changes in the birth rates of China and the USA between 1920 and 2000. 73
- incidence of diseases in Someland from 1960 to 1995 78
- The two graphs compares that oil was the major energy source in the USA in both 1980 and 1990 and that the number of coal natural gas and hydroelectric power remained stable in much the same proportions
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 380, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...re denefits than drawbacks in some cases On the one hand, there were some disadva...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 163, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...e could not enough attention despite of a large number of entertainment such as online game or so...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 187, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...t need paper, furthermore we can reduce a large number of wood and our forest will be reserved. F...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 161, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'way'?
Suggestion: way
...rawbacks. Reading book is a traditional ways of learning which is more suitable for ...
^^^^
Line 7, column 250, Rule ID: MOST_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use only 'greatest' (without 'more') when you use the superlative.
Suggestion: greatest
...ast while learning from the Internet is more greatest and the most common forms of method for...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, furthermore, if, look, second, secondly, so, while, for example, such as, first of all, in some cases, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1426.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 289.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.93425605536 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80707943012 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.515570934256 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 457.2 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.9367634638 49.4020404114 129% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.833333333 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0833333333 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.0 7.06120827912 184% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.268343114911 0.244688304435 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0897001959395 0.084324248473 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0640204786899 0.0667982634062 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161749697573 0.151304729494 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0393619291502 0.056905535591 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.61 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.21 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 78.4519038076 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 19.5 9.78957915832 199% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.